One intriguing feature of the election fallout is the near total silence of Bernie Sanders on the topic of Russian hacks. In light of the Kremlin's alleged pro-Sanders strategy (as a means of supporting Trump), the senator from Vermont seems a little like the dog that wouldn't bark in the night.
Indeed, rather than attack Trump's legitimacy as president, Sanders seems to underline it by pointing to Clinton's defeat as a kind of vindication for his own views.
That's a fair enough position as far as it goes, although Clinton's 2.1 per cent margin of victory in the popular vote somewhat undermines that conclusion.
What's a little more troubling is the CV of his chief strategist, Tad Devine. It turns out that Devine worked as an advisor for Vladimir Putin's man in Kiev, Viktor Yanukovich in 2006, and then for his 2010 election campaign. By curious coincidence another American had very close ties to Yanukovich during this exact period.
That would be Paul Manafort, Trump's one-time campaign manager.
What you know can skew your perception but when you say "You see what you know" i am hearing The truth is what I feel like it should be,
I see what I see, Bernie was put to heal by the Clinton's. He sold you out. Would you like a different metaphor? If your dog bit you, you would keep it.
That may be true, but it is not on point. I am not talking about something I imagined, I saw Sanders go on and on for a year about how crooked Hillary is and then he stabbed you in the back and told you to vote for her. What is it exactly that you are not understanding here?
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
He probably would have been
He probably would have been if the democrats hadnt have desperately wanted to annoint hilldog.
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
Try "...hadn't so desperately
Try "...hadn't so desperately wanted..."
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
http://www.nationalobserver
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/01/14/opinion/trumps-ill-begotten-v...
http://www.nationalobserver.com/2017/01/14/opinion/trumps-ill-begotten-v...
...
One intriguing feature of the election fallout is the near total silence of Bernie Sanders on the topic of Russian hacks. In light of the Kremlin's alleged pro-Sanders strategy (as a means of supporting Trump), the senator from Vermont seems a little like the dog that wouldn't bark in the night.
Indeed, rather than attack Trump's legitimacy as president, Sanders seems to underline it by pointing to Clinton's defeat as a kind of vindication for his own views.
That's a fair enough position as far as it goes, although Clinton's 2.1 per cent margin of victory in the popular vote somewhat undermines that conclusion.
What's a little more troubling is the CV of his chief strategist, Tad Devine. It turns out that Devine worked as an advisor for Vladimir Putin's man in Kiev, Viktor Yanukovich in 2006, and then for his 2010 election campaign. By curious coincidence another American had very close ties to Yanukovich during this exact period.
That would be Paul Manafort, Trump's one-time campaign manager.
...
link shows up in this pic:
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
link shows in this pic:
link shows in this pic:
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
Laughable. You are proof
Laughable. You are proof that liberalism is a mental disorder. Sanders stabbed you in the back and you still support him.
If your girlfriend cheated on you you would ask her to marry you. lol. lol ahhhhhhhhhhh ha ha . Did you even go to college?
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
You see what you know, Jed.
You see what you know, Jed.
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
What you know can skew your
What you know can skew your perception but when you say "You see what you know" i am hearing The truth is what I feel like it should be,
I see what I see, Bernie was put to heal by the Clinton's. He sold you out. Would you like a different metaphor? If your dog bit you, you would keep it.
Bernie Sanders is an asshole.
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
I'm saying that you can't
I'm saying that you can't imagine that which is beyond your intelligence. It's true for everyone.
Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink
That may be true, but it is
That may be true, but it is not on point. I am not talking about something I imagined, I saw Sanders go on and on for a year about how crooked Hillary is and then he stabbed you in the back and told you to vote for her. What is it exactly that you are not understanding here?