CNN - FBI has evidence suggesting collusion

Forums:

This needed a new thread.

http://www.cnn.com/2017/03/22/politics/us-officials-info-suggests-trump-...

US Officials: Info suggests Trump associates may have coordinated with Russians
By Pamela Brown, Evan Perez and Shimon Prokupecz, CNN
Updated 8:00 PM ET, Wed March 22, 2017

Washington (CNN)The FBI has information that indicates associates of President Donald Trump communicated with suspected Russian operatives to possibly coordinate the release of information damaging to Hillary Clinton's campaign, US officials told CNN.

This is partly what FBI Director James Comey was referring to when he made a bombshell announcement Monday before Congress that the FBI is investigating the Trump campaign's ties to Russia, according to one source.

The FBI is now reviewing that information, which includes human intelligence, travel, business and phone records and accounts of in-person meetings, according to those U.S. officials. The information is raising the suspicions of FBI counterintelligence investigators that the coordination may have taken place, though officials cautioned that the information was not conclusive and that the investigation is ongoing.

In his statement on Monday Comey said the FBI began looking into possible coordination between Trump campaign associates and suspected Russian operatives because the bureau had gathered "a credible allegation of wrongdoing or reasonable basis to believe an American may be acting as an agent of a foreign power."

The White House did not comment and the FBI declined to comment.

...

One law enforcement official said the information in hand suggests "people connected to the campaign were in contact and it appeared they were giving the thumbs up to release information when it was ready." But other U.S. officials who spoke to CNN say it's premature to draw that inference from the information gathered so far since it's largely circumstantial.

The FBI cannot yet prove that collusion took place, but the information suggesting collusion is now a large focus of the investigation, the officials said.

Slap on the wrist. 

cnn, lmfao. give a more reputable source please

>> cnn, lmfao. give a more reputable source please

Are the indictments gonna be fake news too? Good luck  

I guess breitbart will wade in....

Or Fox, they credible?  Funny the other day when Comey was testifying about Trump's wire"tapp"ing fantasy Fox, unlike every other channel, simply did not cover it.

Credibility through omission.

i don't watch msm media if i can help it because they are all biased one way or the other. i'd say pretty much everything in print is too, but there's a helluva lot more to choose from in print or blogged or whatever the hell you want to call it.

Hillman do you read RT? Or just post links to RT?

I noticed you posted a link to this article in the thread you started about the London terrorist  attack. https://www.rt.com/usa/381695-rockville-rape-illegal-immigration-sanctuary/

 

RUSSIAN propaganda is your news source, huh. 

Looks like they still got jack dick. 

>>>RUSSIAN propaganda is your news source, huh. 

 

go ahead & post the reason why i said i used RT as a source. same reason i used CNN.  don't leave out important facts like you usually do.

.>>Are the indictments gonna be fake news too?

indictments will be real news if they happen, which I'd bet against. Trump's DOJ is going to investigate Trump's campaign? I don't see it.

still a whole lotta "suggestion" as the title says.

 

 

Not worth it.

Too easy.

 

>> Trump's DOJ is going to investigate Trump's campaign? I don't see it.

The FBI is a unit of DOJ, and they're doing investigating now. If the evidence coming out in the press is strong enough, I think they'll be compelled to indict. But it's true we're a ways from that now.

>>>  cnn, lmfao. give a more reputable source please

 

like Trump?

Hillman, calling CNN unreliable indicates thqat you are willfully ignoring the fact that your Orange GOD is a massive fucking liar.

But you don't like CNN?

How about redstate, Hillman?

http://www.redstate.com/jaycaruso/2017/03/22/4-reasons-devin-nuness-stun...

"...

Nunes created a firestorm with this information because it led to all manner of speculation and incorrect information being bandied about on social media. Nothing helpful came from what he did, despite protests to the contrary. In the end, it looks like nothing more than Nunes giving cover to the Trump administration after the hearings on Monday went very badly for them.

In that vein, here are four reasons why this little stunt by Nunes just created an even bigger mess than before.

..."

 

 

CNN is a more legitimate news source than faux news or Breitbart, so go fuck yourself, and the orange treasonous commie you rode in on. Fucking ruskies. 

Bring back Red Dawn, and let's overthrow the trump/Russian regime already!!!!

 

You know that Russians are capitalist now, right? 

you think i like trump? are you that stupid? then again you swore i was a W fan for 8 years despite being told by others how wrong you were so i guess this shouldn't be surprising.i don't post very often anymore primarily because that's all that's on here is trump, trump, trump. cnn actively worked to get clinton elected & got caught in the act, so any news they may print or broadcast about trump can't be trusted just because they're "cnn". every time i see or hear "trump" i cringe, i simply don't see how he was elected and can't stand the man or his associates. please write that down so you don't forget it and call me a trump supporter for however long he's in office. or after he's out of office either.

sounds like this hillman guy is mad as hell at the news sources people use for their shitty political news and he's not gonna take it here on vivazone anymore.

go get 'em, tiger.

Hopefully trump continues to pay Nunes salary cuz that dude just ruined his career...what a lap dog..,