Wow I thought with all the bullshit at least my taxes would go down, but no. Apparently I need to contribute to a corporate tax cut. Seriously fuck Republicans
No matter what - we are all victims of colossal lies, deceit and theft from this racist, anti-science, anti-logic, fuck everyone but the wealthy Kleptocracy.
If it wasn't for having to deal with the dumbest asshole who ever ruled our country, to his pathetic, corrupt and abhorrent party, we'd be stuck with a bunch of Democratic crooks who rigged the election to help Hillary and fuck Bernie which gave us the Mango Face Fucktard and his fuck the world, I'm the only one that matters reality we are living in.
Yeah corporations and inheritance tax just get cut, but my savings come from some five dimensional chess move. Not buying it. I thought Republicans were just for cutting taxes.
<<<>If it wasn't for having to deal with the dumbest asshole who ever ruled our country, to his pathetic, corrupt and abhorrent party, we'd be stuck with a bunch of Democratic crooks who rigged the election to help Hillary and fuck Bernie which gave us the Mango Face Fucktard and his fuck the world
My tax rate remains the same and I lose my hefty deduction for State and Local taxes (living in NJ, one of the highest taxed states in the country), which will not be offset by the increase in the standard deduction. I will continue to get less back in services than I pay in taxes (NJ tops, or bottoms, the list for least return on investment for federal tax dollars).
The bill as written in the House apparently can't get through the Senate because of budget-related rules. But the things they've decided to cut still send signals about their priorities, and shocking they're not with working people.
>The GOP's focus on the unborn in its tax plan appears to tie into the party's alleged war on abortion rights. Just yesterday, Republican Representative Steve King, of Iowa, presented a six-week abortion banat a House hearing, where he played the ultrasound of an 18-week-old fetus.
"He can't wait to be born," King reportedly said at the time.
King's bill is known as the "Heartbeat Protection Act of 2017" and argues that a woman shouldn't be allowed to seek an abortion after the first detection of a fetal heartbeat.
"The abortion bill would ban abortion before a woman even knows she is pregnant," Symone Sanders, a Democratic strategist, told Newsweek.
"Today we have a tax bill that codifies in law that 529s, aka new tax savings accounts, can be opened in the name of 'children in utero.' This is lock in step with the GOP's war on women and their attempts to limit our bodily autonomy," she said.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Painted Mandolin Treblemaker
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 12:14 pm
No matter what - we are all
No matter what - we are all victims of colossal lies, deceit and theft from this racist, anti-science, anti-logic, fuck everyone but the wealthy Kleptocracy.
If it wasn't for having to deal with the dumbest asshole who ever ruled our country, to his pathetic, corrupt and abhorrent party, we'd be stuck with a bunch of Democratic crooks who rigged the election to help Hillary and fuck Bernie which gave us the Mango Face Fucktard and his fuck the world, I'm the only one that matters reality we are living in.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: jazfish Jazfish
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 12:47 pm
But he says every household
But he says every household will get a four thousand dollar a year raise. Lying mother fuckers.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead love matters
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:18 pm
Thom?
Thom?
good luck spinning on this one
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: The Sound of Steam and Caffeine Zooey
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:22 pm
Wait... wasn't I promised
Wait... wasn't I promised enough money to buy a new car or renovate my kitchen?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: aiq aiq
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:24 pm
World on fire.
World on fire.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger On Wisconsin
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:25 pm
^^^ yes and you can do it all
^^^ yes and you can do it all for the $1,000 that trump’s top economic adviser thinks those things cost!
we are gonna need some lube for this
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: An organ grinder’s tune Turtle
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:27 pm
no, not gonna lower YOUR
no, not gonna lower YOUR taxes...
just corporations and rich people.
go "conservatives", go!
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _ ender
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:31 pm
The bill won't pass. The
The bill won't pass. The Republicans are incompetent and can't get anything done.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alias botb
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:34 pm
Don't worry folks, when the
Don't worry folks, when the corps get their tax breaks, they'll pay it forward.
HAHAHAhahahahahahahahaha
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Alias botb
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:36 pm
What really cheeses me off is
What really cheeses me off is that they want to take the deduction for state taxes away. Fuck you.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Ausonius Thom2
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:42 pm
"Apparently I need to
"Apparently I need to contribute to a corporate tax cut."
Actually, you're contributing to make up for the people that will now be paying 12%.
I thought you guys were all for wealth redistribution? Apparently that's only true if it's other peoples money.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _ ender
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:48 pm
It will definitely cut my
It would definitely cut my taxes. But I take the standard deduction, am married and file jointly, and have children.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: El Nino kxela
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:51 pm
Yeah corporations and
Yeah corporations and inheritance tax just get cut, but my savings come from some five dimensional chess move. Not buying it. I thought Republicans were just for cutting taxes.
Meanwhile Trump Supporters Today
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Bucky Badger On Wisconsin
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 01:53 pm
He steals from the poor and
He steals from the poor and gives to the rich, stupid bitch, Dennis More: https://youtu.be/kp-R1o753pM
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead love matters
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:17 pm
Trump hates California
Trump hates California
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead love matters
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:18 pm
Clown shoes
Clown shoes
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: long live the dead love matters
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:18 pm
Trumps ass hairs are on his
Trumps ass hairs are on his forehead
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Johnny D skudebro
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:19 pm
^No doubt.
^No doubt.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Johnny D skudebro
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:20 pm
I meant the hating California
I meant the hating California part.
But I'll go along with the rest of your statements as well.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: nebulous nelly Orange County Lumber Truck
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:23 pm
Heard that college endowments
Heard that college endowments will be taxed.
Churches will be allowed to engage in political speech and remain tax exempt.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley 73guy
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:39 pm
<<<>If it wasn't for having
<<<>If it wasn't for having to deal with the dumbest asshole who ever ruled our country, to his pathetic, corrupt and abhorrent party, we'd be stuck with a bunch of Democratic crooks who rigged the election to help Hillary and fuck Bernie which gave us the Mango Face Fucktard and his fuck the world
A- fucking - men.
Well said.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: smiley 73guy
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:41 pm
<<<<The bill won't pass. The
<<<<The bill won't pass. The Republicans are incompetent and can't get anything done
and this.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: good at drinking water infinite ignorance
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:56 pm
>>> It would definitely cut
>>> It would definitely cut my taxes. But I take the standard deduction, am married and file jointly, and have children.
You would lose a $4000 persasonal exemption for each member of your family.
If you have one kid, that loss is greater than the expanded standard deduction.
If you have two kids, you just lost 4000 in net deductions (16k for exemptions vs +12 standard).
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _ ender
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 02:59 pm
>> If you have two kids, you
>> If you have two kids, you just lost 4000 in net deductions (16k for exemptions vs +12 standard).
The standard deduction would now be 24k for married couples, right?
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: _ ender
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 03:13 pm
Oh I see what you mean - I
Oh I see what you mean - I lose 16k in exemptions, which is not offset by the increase of 12k in the standard deduction.
But that doesn't factor in the larger child tax credit, $300 credit for parent/non-child dependent, and lower effective tax rate.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Lasher Von Zekenstein zeke17
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 03:20 pm
My tax rate remains the same
My tax rate remains the same and I lose my hefty deduction for State and Local taxes (living in NJ, one of the highest taxed states in the country), which will not be offset by the increase in the standard deduction. I will continue to get less back in services than I pay in taxes (NJ tops, or bottoms, the list for least return on investment for federal tax dollars).
So, fuck me.
No, fuck you!
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: good at drinking water infinite ignorance
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 06:25 pm
Apparently the bill would tax
Apparently the bill would tax the value of academic scholarships for grad students.
http://www.chronicle.com/article/Republican-Tax-Proposal-Gets/241662
That makes sense to me: the GOP hates science, so lets make less of them!
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: Back to Back UncleSam
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 06:28 pm
The bill as written in the
The bill as written in the House apparently can't get through the Senate because of budget-related rules. But the things they've decided to cut still send signals about their priorities, and shocking they're not with working people.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: good at drinking water infinite ignorance
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 06:35 pm
>>> they're not with
>>> they're not with working people.
Foreigners own around a third of the ownership of US companies.
They'll get a big tax cut.
Maybe some of them work.
Prince Allaweed, works, I think...it must be work managing billions of dollars in investments.
I'm sure that giving Prince Allaweed a tax cut will do wonders for our economy.
He'll buy gold toilets in a few new Trump penthouses.
That'll definitely put people to work.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: That’s Nancy with the laughin’ face Nancyinthesky
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 07:02 pm
Will we be allowed to declare
Will we be allowed to declare fetuses as dependents now?
http://www.newsweek.com/fetuses-are-eligible-tax-savings-accounts-under-...
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: That’s Nancy with the laughin’ face Nancyinthesky
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 07:11 pm
>
>The GOP's focus on the unborn in its tax plan appears to tie into the party's alleged war on abortion rights. Just yesterday, Republican Representative Steve King, of Iowa, presented a six-week abortion banat a House hearing, where he played the ultrasound of an 18-week-old fetus.
"He can't wait to be born," King reportedly said at the time.
King's bill is known as the "Heartbeat Protection Act of 2017" and argues that a woman shouldn't be allowed to seek an abortion after the first detection of a fetal heartbeat.
"The abortion bill would ban abortion before a woman even knows she is pregnant," Symone Sanders, a Democratic strategist, told Newsweek.
"Today we have a tax bill that codifies in law that 529s, aka new tax savings accounts, can be opened in the name of 'children in utero.' This is lock in step with the GOP's war on women and their attempts to limit our bodily autonomy," she said.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: jazfish Jazfish
on Friday, November 3, 2017 – 10:29 pm
Good lord holy Jesus amen.
Good lord holy Jesus amen.
Top of Page Bottom of Page PermalinkFull Name: El Nino kxela
on Friday, November 10, 2017 – 04:08 pm