43 Majority MULSIM countries...

Forums:

NOT EFFECTED AT ALL by he so called "Muslim Ban"

 

What a bunch of BULLSHIT!!

 

Gee if it were a "Muslim Ban" it would be pretty irresponsible to leave out the MOST POPULOUS MUSLIM MAJORITY COUNTRY, INDONESIA, No?

Hey LIBTARDS, do you even know what a Judicial Oligarchy is?

WELL YOU ARE BEGGING FOR ONE IF YOU AGREE WITH THIS RIDICULOUS DECISION! ONE THAT IS SOLELY BASED ON POLITICS!!!!!! sooooo irresponsible.

 

They were NOT elected by ANYONE, and about 60% of the rational people in this country AGREE WITH THE plan.

 

nsd WHERE WERE ALL YOU PHONIES WHEN BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA DID EXACTLY THE SAME THING!!?!?!?! EXCEPT his "ban" was on IRAQ and it was for 6 MONTHS!!!! not 180 days!!!

PHONY is as PHONY does, and the LEFT (You know, Demoncrats, who are basically a marginalized, regional party of cry babies and losers) CONTINUES TO LIE ABOUT PRETTY MUCH EVERYTHING!!!!

 

Good luck with that, just know, you are DESTROYING the Constitution.

 

Thanks

 

and oh yea, SINCE WHEN DO WE AFFORD CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS (as these Demoncrat Judisial ACTIVIST JUDGES did) to NON CITIZENS who, in some cases, have never even set foot int he USA.

 

Ok, explain all that away.

 

in other words that maybe you and Hilliary would understand, LIE.

Scum


The 9th Circuit of Appeals is a JOKE.

 

THIS WILL BE REVERSED.

TRUMP's Saftery restriction is 100% Constitutional.

100%

get over it.

Sorry Moose Limb, not Mulsim

 

MUSLIM, Yea I know I know.

 

^Dickwad

lol

We don't need no education...... 

>about 60% of the rational people in this country AGREE WITH THE plan.

 

I know you care not for facts, but.....

 A Business insider poll had it 49%. 

Even the Fox poll had it at 48% agree...42% disagree

Because terrorists can't get their hands on passports from other countries like say Venezuela or France.

If they want to get here, they will and no ban is going to stop them.

image_262.jpg...

Here's a sentence I never imagined myself saying and I mean it sincerely: Thank you, Rudy Giuliani.

Seadog should work for Trump and present those arguments  in favor of the Muslim ban to the courts. I mean, what sane judge wouldn't agree with that rant?!  

 

see you in court, Seadog!

 

I'm convinced that Seadog must own the most spittle-splattered monitor on the interwebz.

I just wonder what it's going to take for the Seadogs to wake up to the fact that they have tied their brand to a mentally ill person.

I know we’re not supposed to bring this up — but it is staring us brutally in the face. I keep asking myself this simple question: If you came across someone in your everyday life who repeatedly said fantastically and demonstrably untrue things, what would you think of him? If you showed up at a neighbor’s, say, and your host showed you his newly painted living room, which was a deep blue, and then insisted repeatedly — manically — that it was a lovely shade of scarlet, what would your reaction be? If he then dragged out a member of his family and insisted she repeat this obvious untruth in front of you, how would you respond?

If the next time you dropped by, he was still raving about his gorgeous new red walls, what would you think? Here’s what I’d think: This man is off his rocker. He’s deranged; he’s bizarrely living in an alternative universe; he’s delusional. If he kept this up, at some point you’d excuse yourself and edge slowly out of the room and the house and never return. You’d warn your other neighbors. You’d keep your distance. If you saw him, you’d be polite but keep your distance.

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2017/02/andrew-sullivan-the-madness...

 

Your mean someone like..Seadog?

Fake safety from the fake president.

Hit and run'd

seapuppy is afraid

very afraid

TGIF Seadoggie.  Nice to see you around these parts. 

 >>>>>You know, Demoncrats, who are basically a marginalized, regional party

 

Got more votes than your guy.

I'm not so sure that having a majority being behind something makes it Constitutional. Nor does the President saying that he wants something.

I'm also wondering, why is the 2nd Amendment more sacrosanct than the 14th Amendment. You can discriminate based on religion for some sort of perceived safety and saving of lives, but you can't have have gun laws, that we know for a fact that will save lives?

If the Republicans want to throw out that the majority support the ban, which should make it okay, then based on that reasoning they should no longer try to make abortion illegal or fuck with LGBTQ rights. The majority also support those.

 

>> Got more votes than your guy.

Even with Russia's help!