Doonesbury dropped from Gannett papers.

Forums:

IMG_0956_1.jpeg

Isn't that the point of Doonesbury?  Always has been.  So much for "freedom of the press."  Go publish but we'll not circulate.

So Gannett didn't ban it, they just dropped it? Is that the point of the above link? Just semantics really. Ridiculous. 

I think the point of that is to debunk the articles that are stating they did so due to this particular strip, it was already done weeks prior to it's release . 

^That makes it sound like the strip above was more of a parting shot by Trudeau then.

Gannett planned to drop Doonesbury weeks ago.

"However, the reality is that the strip had already been dropped by all Gannett-owned newspapers weeks before this newest strip was released. Doonesbury, the first comic strip to win the Pulitzer Prize for Editorial Cartooning, was one of a number of newspaper comic strips to lose its spot in Gannett-owned newspapers due to a unified approach by Gannett towards the "funny pages" of its newspapers."

Gannett is "allowing" its papers to choose from an approved list - they know better than we do. (my sarcasm)

I remember way back when the LA Times chose not to publish one Doonesbury comic that showed Frank Sinatra with gangsters. They did not want to ruffle his feathers.  I Stopped my subscription that day and told them why. Fuck censorship. And long live Doonesbury.