When will indictments mattter?

So Melania is firing authorities now. Weird, man, weird. 

Hey, Tom Banjo

Will the SCOTUS be more concerned about setting "poor precedent" or allowing reality to be addressed appropriately?

Coming Mueller Indictments are questionable at best - Tucker Carlson / Jonathan Turley / Molly Hemingway 11/13/18

https://youtu.be/wE87NgMMI7E

Edit: Mollie 

Bryen, will you accept the findings of Mueller's report as fact?

"Bryen, will you accept the findings of Mueller's report as fact?"

If those findings are proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be true, yes...thus far it has been increasingly exposed to be a complete scam.

^ Watch that video and argue otherwise 

>> ...thus far it has been increasingly exposed to be a complete scam. <<

Yea, I think he needs to release the report before that can be determined. You're showing predetermined bias. Good work.

Question, can you show me any examples of political bias, incompetence or unreliability on any of Muelller's previous work?

>>>>>>If those findings are proven beyond a reasonable doubt to be true, yes...thus far it has been increasingly exposed to be a complete scam.

>

Bryen all lubed up and taken selfies.

Classic Bryen.

Bryen is this your blog?

https://jonathanturley.org/2015/06/18/day-7-farewell-london/

Remember this thread as your Russian narrative evaporates into the ether, enjoy the day.

What narrative of mine do you speak?

I'm waiting for the report to drop before I make any conclusions. 

Can you show me any examples of political bias, incompetence or unreliability on any of Muelller's previous work?

I just listened to your Tucker link. He's actually suggesting that everyone lies in D.C., so perjury charges are just selective. Of course, he fails to mention that the indicted lied under oath to MuellerCo and/or FBI.

The guy responsible for Hillary losing the 2016 presidential election [sarcasm intended]

^ The guy responsible for his own actions including lying to the FBI/MuellerCo. Stone is going down even harder.

https://youtu.be/1k8craCGpgs

Can you show me any examples of political bias, incompetence or unreliability on any of Mueller's previous work? (Still waiting for an answer)

He used to be a GOP Hero. So sad what has become of the Grand Ol' Party.

(sssnort) a bump for Bryen.

Ihus far it has been increasingly exposed to be a complete scam.<<

F**k this guy.

35 indictments/pleas and counting.

political bias, incompetence or unreliability on any of Mueller's previous work - Google Search

https://www.google.com/search?q=political+bias,+incompetence+or+unreliab...

"Everything in our research, everything that we've looked at in terms of the contributions made by attorneys, the contributions made by other elite professions, suggested to us that what Mueller was doing was exactly what you would expect from an ideologically neutral way of hiring your team. It's showing us that, it actually looks that he did not take ideology into account when assembling his team. He did not take partisanship into account. Because if you didn't, you'd get the team basically that he came up with."

HKS Harvard (from your link)

Dude...the top article, from '17, was republished by CNN to point out how biased Whitaker is.     

The point is, in moments via these computers in our pockets you can find endless talking points to support whatever argument you'd like, cherry pick until 2020 and on, there's nothing to the evaporating Russian narrative, if you're late to that reality you need to pull your head from the sand, Hillary lost because Hillary lost, that may turn your whole worldview upside down, but you'll thank me later.

thus far it has been increasingly exposed to be a complete scam. 

 there's nothing to the evaporating Russian narrative

bryen has been pushing this narrative since the moment he showed up. that is the only reason he's here, other than posting threads of random youtoob links with out context that no one else posts in.

he's a complete stooge.

>>>>>there's nothing to the evaporating Russian narrative

How can you say that when some of it played out in plain sight?

>> there's nothing to the evaporating Russian narrative <<

We will see, but I guess you've already read the report. lol

I will speak for me and me alone: I'm not trying to justify Clinton's loss, or to flip the results of the election. I'm hoping the results of the probe will reveal any LIES told to the public from TrumpCo regarding involvement with Russians, WikiLeaks, etc. Remember, Trump himself said there was no contact with Russia or it's agents by anyone in his campaign. Good luck with that.

You're welcome

Trump himself may not be indicted, but you have to be daft to call it an “evaporating narrative.”

I wonder if Flynn, Manafort, Papodopolous, Gates, Pinedo, Kilmnick et al agree with that assessment.

Are you light housing us?  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ayayZ1zlSdA

The hands are too big....

Trump himself may not be indicted, but you have to be daft to call it an “evaporating narrative.”<<<<

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor

... or at least has a foot in the door

"Is there one that will work? "

You really should be a bit more cautious about reveling your true intentions.

>>>>>>>You really should be a bit more cautious about reveling your true intentions.

Totally.  Like when you post links to white power websites.

yeah post a link to a partisan think tank.