YAY! No Really, let's bring more of them here!!!!!

Forums:

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2774773/louvre-museum-paris-terrorist-atta...

 

Allahu Akbar!!!

Can we LEARN from Europe's continuing MISTAKES?!?!?!
And BTW it's NOT the Statue of Immigration, it's the Statue of LIBERTY!  so please don't even go there.

Emma Lazurus' poem was added as a FUND RAINING TOOL (to raise money to renovate the pedestal.) years AFTER THE ORIGINAL STATUE WAS PRESENTED BY FRANCE.

No, EXTREME vetting is necessary.

sorry, it just is.

 

Never forget the Bowling Green Massacre!

You can donate to help the victims here:

https://www.bowlinggreenmassacrefund.com/

Never forget Bowling Green.

Yes, seapup, let's give these American Muslims more reason NOT to report people being radicalized.

 

http://www.denverpost.com/2017/02/02/denver-mosque-homeland-security-rtd...

Denver mosque leaders warned Homeland Security that RTD shooting suspect “was advanced in his path of radicalization”

Feds acknowledge receiving warning, as well as photos and videos

(((FUND RAINING)))

Better add France to the list.

Seadog, I thought we hated France?

Do you have crinkle cut Freedom Fries in your freezer?

Seapup, if you make it back to the thread you started (given your history it's unlikely, but just in case) perhaps you could explain how Trumpf chose the 6 countries of Syria, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen, but didn't set on any restrictions on Saudi Arabia, Egypt, the United Arab Emirates and Lebanon. You know, those countries that the 9/11 hijackers were from? One of his mouthpieces, Reince Priebus says it doesn't have anything to do with Trumpf's business interests in those countries, but I find that hard to believe. Comments?

Outrage over Quebec?

Honest question:

 

Does USA currently have more stringent vetting of refugees than EU?

seadoggie get's the numbers. that's for sure. 

And still, more American kids die in school shootings than do all Americans from foreign terrorists (save for 9/11). 

Ban the Muslims, but fuck no, don't ban the guns.

We don't want another Bowling Green Massacre.

All things being equal, it's fucking stupid as shit that conservatives don't think that a 2-year vetting process isn't enough for refugee families, from countries that have never terrorized the US, but any vetting of potential gun owners is wrong, even when guns are a far bigger threat.

^Even for people with severe mental illness, right?

 

Anyone remember Fort Lauderdale?

 

http://www.npr.org/2017/02/02/513126985/house-votes-to-overturn-obama-ru...

 

 

I understand that the reasoning (backed by ACLU) behind not wanting to paint too broad of a brush to stigmatized people with disabilities.  But doesn't this contradict the insistence that American people be safe?

 

IMHO, being killed is the same, regardless of who is doing the killing.

I am still confused.  Someone, please explain. The refugees from various middle eastern places were fine 15-20  years back, but then foreign influences fomented civil wars and/or bombings and/or food shortages.

So, I didn't vote for that targeted displacement.  It seems most realistic for those who started the shit to step up and provide refuge for the displaced.

If Norway or Sweden or Finland stirred up all that shiite, let them create new colonies, under their existing laws, to adopt the new productive citizens.

Why am I supposed to welcome zillions of new neighbors ??

Jerseyland is already overcrowded.

South Dakota has lots of open space, same w/ N. Dakota and Wyoming.