Kavanaugh accusation

Forums:

So even i saw the accusation as a little last minute desperation to halt Kavanaugh's appointment. BUT now we have a professor willing to self identify and lay out specifics. Will it be enough to topple his nomination?

 

Kavanaugh.

Another fine representative of Generation X.

The GOP didn’t let it stop them from voting to approve Thomas, not going to stop them here.

the documents the GOP have hidden are of more importance, and aren’t he said/she said. 

Whether it stops them or not - it will hurt them whatever transpires.

The Republican Party was already losing the votes of many women.

This will only help them to lose more votes from women.

50 days or so.

Then BOOM!

While I would like to think this would cause at least one or two defections, I fear that the GOP power structure will not let this hold up the confirmation and they will push their guy through before November by hook or crook.  It will be ugly.

Pray for RBG.

I think it won't stop his appointment.  The only "x factor" I see is the #metoo background which has instantly toppled many powerful creeps lately. I'm happy with just slowing the mess down. we shall see.   I just have so little faith in the rational anymore.

>> Another fine representative of Generation X. <<

 

It's not our fault. We went through puberty when Porky's and Risky Business were in the theaters.

A bunch of old white men pushing through Kavanaugh's nomination will be an awesome public relations maneuver for the Republican cause.

>>It's not our fault.

It is, but y'all are good with excuses.

[[[[[[THE X GENERATION]]]]]

 

Nancy hit the nail on the head. 

I think he will still get the nomination. Its not like when Ginsburg admitted smoking cannabis. Leaving egg on Ronnie's face. 

>>>will be an awesome public relations maneuver for the Republican cause

Does it even matter.   People just vote for Dems or Repubs without even thinking these days.   It's like cheering on your favorite sports team.   It doesn't matter what happened as long as you win.   

 

Don Jr. keeping it classy as usual.

apparently the alleged 3rd person in the room was his school chum with the last name Judge...well I guess he wrote a memoir or book about the culture of binge drinking and debauchery in their little prep school. So that's his alibi...

 

Clearly a forgery.  Any future Supreme Court nominee would have had the whole "i before e, except after c" thing down by 3rd Grade.

I cant think of junior wo thinking of his caricature on "our cartoon president". lol

And Zang, I agree. Rational thinking about candidates seems to be fading.  This might have the effect of people just getting further entrenched in what they *think* is right.  (double entendre?) 

I hold a little hope because the swamp is getting drained...of drump pals!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YuRa1Br4K7o

the GOP power structure will not let this hold up the confirmation and they will push their guy through before November by hook or crook<<<

Seeing how they've buried their heads in the sand re: the POTUS possibly leaving our nation's jugular exposed to the world, I believe overlooking Kavanaugh's transgressions will be a walk in a park

It'll be interesting to see what happens if he gets shut down, will the GOP still try to push someone else through before midterms?

 

 

>>>>will the GOP still try to push someone else through before midterms?

They simply won't have time before November.  However, a new Congress will not be seated until January, so they might have time to start from scratch and get someone else in before then.  But that will still be pushing it and they would have to decide right away whether to run with the teenage rapist or find someone new.  

Dude looks pretty rapey.

I’m not normally pro prison-rape, but for Don Jr I can make an exception. A serious POS. 

Confirm>Pink/Blue Wave>Congress Flip>SCOTUS Impeach>New nomination 2019.

bring it...

How come those Trump boys, with all their money, can't get decent dental work done already? Both of their mouths look like they went through a meat grinder.

They like that inbred look. 

Is this guy dumb enough to lie about this incident under oath? Does he not recall what the meaning of IS is?

 

 

Likely the he'll just say he does not recall, ala Sessions. Now whether or not he'll say "I was too drunk to recall"...

 

How can he get caught lying under oath?

The same way Clinton was caught, Sealion 

 

If you don't know your history, Google is your friend

 

 

What happened to Clinton?

she won the popular vote

ironic, isn't it?

 

 

cause she's so unpopular with a lot of people.

>>>> the same way Clinton was caught

Well, with Clinton, there was some physical evidence of the lying.  In this case, its a he said/she said.  She sounds credible enough and I can totally see that guy as a creepy, rapey prep-school douche.   But the lady's credible story, by itself, may not be enough to support an impeachment for lying under oath.

So do they bring in the other people from that story to testify?  Wasn't there another guy, and possibly 4 other women? Will CSPAN break into the reality TV market?  Will the Republicans throw the whole thing out?  Will the people demand more tweets?  Will fucks be given???  

No need to impeach, just need a couple GOP senators to vote NO

"

"creepy, rapey prep-school douche"

-there's a bull market for these guys now

A president being investigated for collusion with the Russian government gets to pick 2/9th of a jury they may decide his fate. Any zoners get to pick there judges when going to court? It's ok I'll wait for the answer. 

Rapist POTUS picks rapist SCOTUS.

Republicans ruined the supreme court. Dems will pack the court next time there in control nominating Judge Garland has the 10th justice then as many that are needed to give the dems one more justice than the GOP. 7-6 or 6-5 something like that.

No TENURE for SCOTUS it's time for term limits for Judges.

> But the lady's credible story, by itself, may not be enough to support an impeachment for lying under oath.

 

well, she did pass a lie detector test. they could make him take the test..pretty sure he's sweating right now since he jumped the gun and already denied it. really should have stuck with "I can't recall" - I mean that's actually believable, given that he probably was a shitfaced drunk teenager. just seems like the lamest way to derail the nominee, but I'll take it that's all that sticks. he's obviously got tons of skeletons in the closet and this one is small potatoes. 

Noodlerlion is funny 

>>>>>Dems will pack the court next time there in control nominating Judge Garland has the 10th justice then as many that are needed to give the dems one more justice than the GOP. 7-6 or 6-5 something like that.

 

Mot gonna happen.

so many sea lions

Noodler was being ironic, Poolion. Not so many, just you. 

Are you being ironic?  If you don't know what ironic means, google is your friend. 

>>>then as many that are needed to give the dems one more justice than the GOP. 7-6 or 6-5 something like that.

FDR tried that.  Didn't work.

"On Friday, Judge Kavanaugh ‘categorically and unequivocally’ denied this allegation. This has not changed. Judge Kavanaugh and the White House both stand by that statement."

 

I suspect that more victims will come forward now. He's a lying SOB, just like Donnie. 

2 party system surf. Who's gonna stop it in a majority rule system where the minority is ignored when not in power?

Obama elected GOP takes control of congress and nothing gets done for 6 years. Signing statement president only no legislation. Trump elected even with a GOP congress is mostly a signing statement president no legislation outside of tax cuts. Plenty of time to campaign for midterms while on the job. GOP wouldn't work with Obama not it's payback time with Trump in office after midterms for the Dems.

Court-packing, Democrats’ nuclear option for the Supreme Court, explained

Why an FDR plan from the 1930s is suddenly popular again.

By Dylan Matthews@dylanmattdylan@vox.com  Updated Jul 10, 2018, 3:33pm EDT

https://www.vox.com/2018/7/2/17513520/court-packing-explained-fdr-roosev...

Dr. Ford mentioned the almost rape to her husband in 2002 and 2006. She told her therapist in 2012 so she has a shit-ton of credibility unlike the GOP thugs. Flake & Corker are our best bets.

Ford vs Kavanaugh monday

Accuser Will Publicy Testify Monday

Christine Blasey Ford has accused the Supreme Court nominee of attempted sexual assault when they were teens.

By Ryan Grenoble and Igor Bobic

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/brett-kavanaugh-christine-ford-hear...

You know, I probably wouldn't hold much of anything someone did in high school against them 30 years later if they were properly contrite, showed insight into their wrongdoing, and seemed to have learned the appropriate lessons and made the appropriate changes.  People really change a lot after that time period.  However, I am concerned with the possibility that he might be lying NOW, which is not cool for a Supreme Court Justice.  Needs to be investigated.

Completely false. yeah...

 

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-09-17/white-house-is-said-n...

 

>The White House hasn’t asked the FBI to investigate the allegation that Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh sexually assaulted a woman when they were in high school, a request required for the bureau to take further action, according to two people familiar with the matter.

The FBI’s initial background investigation into Kavanaugh was completed before Christine Blasey Ford came forward with the allegation. Kavanaugh, who has denied the allegation as “completely false,” and Ford have both said they’re willing to testify before Congress.

shit-ton of women on senate committee this time around unlike Anita Hill.

Might be real interesting week for the white house, daily news page 6 says that ronan farrow has copies of the celebrity apprentice tapes where our leader uses bad language. 

Kavanaughs buddy mark judge is a scum bag. They should have him testify, the books he wrote make his highschool days sound some what like mine with less drinking and fewer attempted rapes and more smoking. I spent the last 3 years of my hs days in a catholic school and those boys were clueless when it came to getting laid. They had a deal they called getting grabs. I guess that meant you tried to grab some girls boobs in mostly inappropriate places. 

>>>daily news page 6 says that ronan farrow has copies of the celebrity apprentice tapes where our leader uses bad language. 

 

Tom Arnold
(@TomArnold)

Mark Burnett just went apeshit & choked me at this huge Emmy party then he ran away with his torn Pink shirt & missing gold chain. I’m waiting for LAPD

 

Roma Downey
(@RealRomaDowney)

Got this bruise tonight when Tom Arnold tried to ambush my husband Mark and me at a charity event. Is your TV show worth it Tom?Please stop

 

Tom Arnold
(@TomArnold)

FYI: Kevin Bacon is a solid reliable brawl witness. Sosie Bacon is a wingman.

 

https://twitter.com/search/tom+arnold

>>>>Kavanaughs buddy mark judge is a scum bag. They should have him testify, the books he wrote make his highschool days sound some what like mine with less drinking and fewer attempted rapes and more smoking.

 

yeah it’s pretty amazing that the 3rd person in the room with Kavanaugh and Ford is a guy who has authored a book on his time as an alcoholic in high school and college: https://www.amazon.com/Wasted-Tales-Mark-Gauvreau-Judge/dp/1568381425

The Moral Majority, ladies and gentlemen. 

 

>>>>will the GOP still try to push someone else through before midterms?

They simply won't have time before November.  However, a new Congress will not be seated until January, so they might have time to start from scratch and get someone else in before then.  But that will still be pushing it and they would have to decide right away whether to run with the teenage rapist or find someone new<<<

Yeah, figured it'd be a stretch, but wouldn't put midnight confirmation past them.

They have a list of alternates all prepared in case Rapey Creepy creeps out a couple of Republicans.

In 2009, massage therapist Molly Hagerty went to the Portland, Ore., Police and gave a lengthy statement claiming that about three years earlier, former vice president Al Gore “pinned her to a bed in his hotel suite, forcibly French kissed her, and groped her breasts.” She described herself as “petrified during the encounter and how she had to bolt the room to avoid being raped.” She also described Gore as having a violent temper. She had gone to Portland Police three years earlier, but abruptly stopped cooperating with the investigation. Then, without a clear explanation, she returned and gave a full account to investigators.

The Portland Police opened an investigation and interviewed Gore. In June of 2010, news of the investigation broke, and Gore adamantly denied the accusation. Steve Kornacki, then of Salon and currently with MSNBC, told his readers that three reasons to be skeptical jump out: The Portland Police had not initially chosen to follow up on her allegation, a local newspaper had heard her story and chosen to not publish any articles about it, and that several celebrities are falsely accused of sex crimes before.

Alexandra Petri of the Washington Post pointed to the masseuse’s comment that Gore behaved like a “crazed sex poodle” and chuckled, “There are hundreds of jokes to be made here. I won’t make any of them, because I don’t want the world to be destroyed by global warming.” Marc Ambinder, then with The Atlantic, assessed her account with great skepticism:

The narrative is pulpy and riveting and tragicomic. You half expect there to be a reference to a “torn bodice” at some point. Either the masseuse or Mr. Gore has an extremely vivid imagination, and in our system of justice, we must presume that since the police did not file charges, Gore is innocent.

(You notice that there is little of this skepticism and reasoning around for the current accusations against Judge Brett Kavanaugh.)

The Portland District Attorney’s office chose not to press charges against Gore, contending that Hagerty failed a polygraph test, sold her story to the National Enquirer, and had not agreed to turn over certain medical records. “This case is not appropriate for criminal prosecution. The matter is closed and the investigative materials will be returned to PPB [the Portland Police Bureau].” The former Vice President was cleared of the charges, or at least as much as a man can be.

The only two people who know precisely what happened in that room are Al Gore and the masseuse, but there is no fair way to characterize Gore as a sexual predator or a creep. Sexual predators don’t look a certain way, publicly behave a certain way, or vote a certain way.

Nor do they come from particular backgrounds. In the coming days, you’re likely to hear a lot of sneering about wealthy and privileged white guys who attended prep schools and the Ivy Leagues, a lot of fuming about how anyone with a background like Brett Kavanaugh’s — mother who is a judge, father who is a head of a perfume-maker’s trade association, Georgetown Prep, Yale University — must be arrogant, entitled, smug, and elitist. Of course, that background is hard to distinguish from Al Gore’s — father who is a senator, mother who is a lawyer, living in the Fairfax Hotel on Embassy Row in Washington, attending Saint Albans prep school and going on to Harvard University.

Apparently, we only hate the preppies when they’re in the other party.

https://www.nationalreview.com/the-morning-jolt/the-double-standard-for-...

Is Al Gore up for the supreme court? Classic whataboutism!

GOP and their supporters have learned well from their new close friends the Russians.

Do you belong to that tribe Thom?

 

 

Do yourself a favor and read woodwards book. Maybe you wouldn't feel so obliged to support this clown and his cronies. 

Thom speaks people don't listen due to whataboutism

but, but....democrats...

 

 

Thom Revere just rode into town screaming "The Clinton's are coming, The Clinton's are coming"

>>Apparently, we only hate the preppies when they’re in the other party.

Yes. They suck.

They need to put Mark Judge on the stand, see if he is willing to lie under oath.

I read a conservative tweet that said what parent would allow unsupervised drinking in their home in 1983. What planet do they live on?

In 1977 a new kid started at my school. His parents had a home in the toniest part of town. His room had its own bathroom, we had keg parties in his room. 

A party at another kids house in this same neighborhood ended with the police pounding on the door. We all ran out the back door following the kid who lived there. He had a cast on his arm and ran into a stop sign.

He spun around in a circle and landed on his ass. We all laughed our asses off. Of course the popo got him. 

>>>The Portland District Attorney’s office chose not to press charges against Gore, contending that Hagerty failed a polygraph test, sold her story to the National Enquirer, and had not agreed to turn over certain medical records.

The current accuser has passed a polygraph, hasn’t sold her story to anyone, and turned over her therapist notes. Are you saying you believe her Thom?

>They need to put Mark Judge on the stand, see if he is willing to lie under oath.

 

Yes, but Grassley already said that he will not allow it him to testify. And Trump’s Justice Department will not allow the FBI to investigate the allegations. I 

 

Only chance is to stall these hearings till after the midterms and flip the enough seats.

^he can still be comfirmed during the lame duck session 

But wait. Elmer Fudd McConnel will come up with a pwan for some new wules to get this passed NOW!

I think unsupervised drinking in high school was probably more prevalent in 1983 than it is today. Whose parents are out of town?????????

 

 

Thom, no one is suggesting that Kavanaugh be charge with a crime.  If and when Gore runs for office again or is nominated to a judgeship I assume those allegations would be an issue.

It would also be interesting if someone followed up on this invitation from federal court employees to investigate whether Kavanaugh lied about what he knew about Justice Kozinski's wierdo porn at work thing.  https://theintercept.com/2018/09/17/cyrus-sanai-federal-court-employees-...

Feinstein be playing god mang, dump that bitch.

>>Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley has been forced to postpone a vote scheduled for Thursday on Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination because Arizona Sen. Jeff Flake finally made himself useful by demanding the committee examine the allegations by Christine Blasey Ford that Kavanaugh attacked her when they were in high school. Grassley has scheduled a hearing for Monday in response, reportedly with just two witnesses: Kavanaugh and Ford. Except that he didn't bother to contact Ford before he scheduled it.

If you think this was just some mistake by Grassley, or a mere oversight, think again. He's setting a narrative, which he made abundantly clear Tuesday morning in an interview with conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt. That Ford hasn't yet been able to commit to that date, Grassley says, "kind of raises the question, do they want to come to the public hearing or not."

Fellow Republican and South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham piped up to prove yet again with proof that he buried anything resembling his principles with his good friend John McCain. "She can come if she likes, but if she doesn't want to, she doesn't have to," Graham said on Fox News, proving that they're only asking her to testify because they have to—not because they care about what happened to her.

Republicans don't want a real public hearing, and Grassley and Trump have proved it by not directing an actual investigation into the matter by the FBI. As California Sen. Dianne Feinstein says, "it's impossible to take this process seriously." She points out that Grassley has invited just two witnesses, compared to the 22 witnesses at the Anita Hill hearing in 1991, which took three days. "What about other witnesses like Kavanaugh's friend Mark Judge," the alleged accomplice in that attack. "What about individuals who were previously told about this incident? What about experts who can speak to the effects of this kind of trauma on a victim?"

None of that matters to Republicans. Grassley is merely going through the motions, and doing so in as politicized a manner as he possibly can. If getting to the truth was at issue at all here, Kavanaugh's nomination would already be history because of his serial perjuries.

https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2018/9/18/1796643/-Grassley-playing-pol...

>Brett Kavanaugh talking about his high school in 2015: “What happens at Georgetown Prep, stays at Georgetown Prep.”

 

No so fast..

The crazy thing is that this attempted rape allegation probably isn't nearly as bad as what Trump, Kavanaugh, and their allies seem to be trying to hide in unprecedented fashion during this whole process.

 

Let that thought sink in a little...

NYTimes says Ms.Blasey-Ford has not confirmed she will be there Monday.  That's a bit worrisome.  Maybe she is following advice of counsel.  I hope she shows.

Good on Ford for asking for a full investigation...

right, anyone who thinks all of this smoke and mirror diversion isnt started by Trump himself isnt looking close enough. He has the media focused exactly where he wants them. pure genius, really

>>>>He has the media focused exactly where he wants them. pure genius, really

For what its worth, that is exactly what Michael Moore has been saying recently.  He even suspects that it was Trump himself or someone working with him that penned the anonymous NYT op ed.  

interesting.  Mayhaps we give MDOTUS too much credit? 

I could see that, itd be right out of his playbook for sure

She’s gone into hiding after receiving numerous death threats. Guess that means the FBI will NOW have to investigate. 

The Over-Under:

Kavanaugh will be thrown under the bus over the weekend.

The recent accusations aside, F him for the hypocritical partisan hack he is.

Has apparently perjured himself before Congress numerous times dating back to 02/04/06? That alone should be grounds for disbarment? Jail? Certainly the removal of the candidate to the highest office in the land.

The "right's" goal is to take of the courts nation wide with far right idelogues.

 

“Cut Bait”: As the Kavanaugh Nightmare Escalates, Trump Is Gripped with Uncertainty as Ivanka Suggests Cutting the Judge Loose

 

https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/09/kavanaugh-allegations-trump-ivanka

Can’t they nominate a different conservative judge or is the upcoming mid-term election factoring in? Is this a race against time before Election Day? 

I read that Merrick Garland was praised a few times during the hearings maybe they should give him a shot. 

White House has been gettin the FBI some work recently.

the jerkbag dems are fine with any other candidate put forward by that bastion of democratic values, the federalist soceity....

 

http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/jurisprudence/2017/01/ho...

Why doesn't the FBI give him a polygraph. The Ford lady took one. Serious question

Polygraphs aren't really accurate, and are not admissible in court for that reason (not that this is court, but an illustration of them being unreliable). For instance, a psychopath like Trump would probably pass.  There are even people who do seminars in how to fool them.

I don't blame Ford for not wanting to testify, but I also can see that when someone comes in with an accusation 30 years later there needs to be some serious examination.  I mean, it is possible that they were ALL drunk and perceive the event differently.  I know that I look back on some things when I was young and now I can say "Wow, that shit was fucked up" when at the time it was just part of how it was. Maybe the other person doesn't remember it at all.  However, I sense a lack of candor by Kavanaugh on a number of issues, so his denial doesn't hold a lot of weight with me.

I'm really annoyed with Feinstein.  By holding this until the last second she set this poor woman up to have to make a snap decision about testifying while leaving the door wide open for the GOP to complain this is last minute shenanigans and try to push this through.  I mean, there was NO WAY they were going to toss the nomination without a full vetting of the allegations and her identity would eventually be revealed.  I feel like she has outted this poor woman for nothing.  And if Ford doesn't show on Monday, then the GOP has the perfect excuse to go forward.  I don't blame her if she doesn't but I think it's better for everyone if she does.  Ugh, what a mess.

^That's why 17 year-olds are not considered adults.  Well, unless they want to join the military to kill people and blow up stuff. 

 

Regarding the timing of the allegations: didn't the alleged victim want to hold off so she wouldn't have to come forward if K nomination wasn't successful?

Makes total sense that she didn’t want to come forward unless absolutely necessary. Have you seen the backlash? She’s had to flee her home with her family because of Death threats. Another classmate also came forward to say she was a witness and immediately began getting harassed and receiving death threats. 

What it sounds like is that if the existence of the letter had not been leaked to the press, that Feinstein would have kept this a secret and not told anyone there was a possible attempted rapist on the Supreme Court.  But then when it got leaked she rushed to reveal it without running it through Ford.  She says she can't remember whether she even spoke to Ford after she got the letter, which raises a whole other set of issues about our 85 year old Senator who is running for another term. She didn't even ask any oblique questions at the hearings which would have allowed dem investigators to get a handle on whether either K or F were straight up fabricating, or box K into giving answers that can be checked out later.

The reality is that if Ford sends a letter and it dies in a Senator's office, she might as well not have bothered. Feinstein should have met with her and explained that and tried to come up with some solution, whether it was asking at the hearing, coming out with it earlier, or never revealing it at all if that's what she wanted. They could have agreed that it would be released at some reasonable time if the nomination was still viable.  They could have tried to arrange for private bipartisan questioning--her identity would still have come out but she might have avoided the public spectacle. By waiting until the last minute it just seems to have been handled the worst way possible--sucks for Ford, who is getting death threats and understandably does not wish to testify, and gives the GOP an easy way out of this.  And worst of all, if she doesn't show this guy may end up in the Supreme Court with a giant asterisk, which completely erodes the integrity of this once-august body.  I can only hope that this concern causes the GOP to pause on this but in this climate I doubt it.  Let's just say that even if you give Feinstein a pass for the difficult situation, the way it was handled led to a terrible situation for everyone now.

 

Well, integrity went put the window when Clarence Thomas was seated on the Court  even though there were credible allegations of sexual harassment. And the fact that the GOP never even gave Merrick Garland a hearing

 

Funny how the GOP conversation is changing now and instead of saying they believe Kavanaugh they’re crying about that it’s not fair to hold someone accountable for teenager  behavior. Even though Kavanaugh continues to deny it ever happened.

>>>>Makes total sense that she didn’t want to come forward unless absolutely necessary

It was absolutely necessary a couple of weeks ago. Or she could have said "No, I never want it revealed", which I understand, but then why send the letter at all. Maybe she had faith that Feinstein could do something with it behind the scenes that would have resolved this while preserving anonymity, but Diane wasn't able to do that.

I'm so over Feinstein.  Not just for this, her time is done, take your pearls and give someone else a chance.

One thing is for sure, during the trump presidency people now believe they know a profound amount about he political system, regardless of whether they do or not 

Thomas was accused of making a lame joke about pubic hair, not attempted rape. Even by today's standards that's a pretty big difference, even given K's youth at the time (which I agree could be a mitigating factor).

>>> it’s not fair to hold someone accountable for teenager  behavior. Even though Kavanaugh continues to deny it ever happened.

I can see that depending on the circumstances and if the person has insight and made changes, but that raises the concern about whether he is lying about it now.

he’s boxed himself into a corner with his lies.

Then again, it’s worked for him in the past and the GOP don’t seem to care if he’s lying or not.

 

 

Can they give him a sobriety test?

 

 

>>>>Kavanaugh continues to deny it ever happened.

I was wondering what would have happened if he fessed up to it and made a humble and sincere apology.   Guess its too late for that now.

Senator creepy:  So Judge what was she wearing?

Judge rapey:  She had on a skimpy plaid skirt and a see-thru halter.

Senator creepy:  OHHH so she was asking for it.

Judge rapey: Yes, That is what I recall sir.

Senator creepy:  So if you covered her mouth better and got her pregnant, would you have asked her to abort the poor baby person inside her?

Judge rapey:  Ummmmm

What you say makes sense to me, Alias.

 

I'm still not sure whom I'm going to vote for regarding the Senate seat.

I will readily admit to a little ageism when it comes to 85 year olds running for new terms of office. I'm a bad person.

The crazy thing is that this attempted rape allegation probably isn't nearly as bad as what Trump, Kavanaugh, and their allies seem to be trying to hide in unprecedented fashion during this whole process<<<

The mere fact that the Senate is even considering a nomination from Trump at this point is by far and way the "worst" part of any of this, IMO.

I don't even know where to begin, but the most pressing concern is national security and the nation being on one giant "ghost ride" - if not in the pocket of Putin.  The GOP in Congress have essentially allowed Trump to carry on in office unchecked; with him serving as an "institutional placeholder" to further their agendas and retain power.   It will only be a matter of time before a significant violent conflict somewhere on this planet will be attributed to the current situation & IMO the GOP who've abdicated their oversight duty ought to receive the brunt of the blame if they've abandoned the proper means to achieve an end such as SCOTUS.  

What do you do after you blame them?

false sense of moral superiority?

 I was happy to see this thread had legs wo much of the usual bs and diversion that goes on. Thx. :)

What do you do after you blame them?<<<

McConnell should be flayed.  Literally.

History (if we make it) will illuminate the severity of the Senate's dereliction of duty; and the extent to which they've exposed our nation to harm.

How long can the GOP in the Senate continue to pretend "all is well" in the Oval Office and not receive severe political backlash?  This is the scary part ... since they're kind of backing themselves into a corner to be forced to keep doubling down along with Trump.

 

false sense of moral superiority?<<<

I hold absolutely zero moral judgment.

Yet I will fight for truth & the rule of law; even if it means being pitted against those I would otherwise never would confront.

>>>>>How long can the GOP in the Senate continue to pretend "all is well" in the Oval Office and not receive severe political backlash? 

 

As long as they win elections? 

>I'm so over Feinstein.  Not just for this, her time is done, take your pearls and give someone else a chance.<

this

remember when mcconnell said if hillary won they would indefinitely postpone supreme court hearings?

i mean, how do these people look themselves in the mirror? 

how are millions of dipshit americans brainwashed into thinking any of this is ok?

 

^This.  "sad"

Hiccup...NYT breaking news 

Ford negotiating terms for Monday senate hearing

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/20/us/politics/brett-kavanaugh-christine...

Hiccup...

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/dean-heller-kavanaugh-hiccup_us_5ba...

#HellerHiccupFuckYouToWomen

IMO: Anyone who has an average sense of reason should conclude that the person who calls for an investigation has nothing to hide, while the person who is against such an investigation is afraid of what may be revealed. 

 

Am I wrong to believe this logical conclusion?

seems obvious and to me  but I feel logic has gone by the wayside these days. Its quite frightening and I hope the Midterms reflect a change. 

Buckle Up

 

Michael Avenatti✔@MichaelAvenatti

All indications are that Dr. Ford is not alone. Buckle up - that includes you Mark Judge. #Basta

5:09 PM - Sep 22, 2018

gnarly cartoon.

Heard that Kavanaugh ​supporters were doing back round investigations into Dr. Blasey Ford before her allegations were made public. Things that make you go Hmmmm.

- Kavi if put on the court could be blackmailed by idiot friend Mark Judge or people who knew.

- I wonder what (D) Feinstein got to sit on this Dr. Ford letter? I bet it's something on Defense knowing Republicans and her.

trump/GOP are guilty of  Witness tampering... obstruction of justice.

 

 

Follow the $130,000

 

 

 

 

 

Frat boy SCOTUS for a generation. Women will be fucking hiding at the Clarence Thomas and Brett Kavanaugh office parties. 

Is that a world you want??????????????????????????????????????????????

1dea723-1.jpg

 

Kavanaugh's college photos starting to appear online.

 

 

BREAKING: Trump Asks for That List of Other Rich White Male Judges Who Promised to Acquit Him   -Andy Borowitz

bye bye Kavi...

Second Woman Accuses Brett Kavanaugh Of Sexual Misconduct In New Yorker Bombshell

The Supreme Court nominee denied the latest allegation, calling it a “smear, plain and simple.”

By Nick Visser

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/new-yorker-deborah-ramirez-brett-ka...

Kauvanaugh has a calendar from that time period and it's  clearly is missing any notation of him getting drunk and wavying his willy in her face.  See, say the GOP, it never happenedfrown

is that the douche crew i keep hearing about?

Kavanaugh Annoyed That He Has to Write Up a Whole New 1983 Calendar Now   -Andy Borowitz

 

Probably didn’t put gang rape on his calendar either.

As long as the biggest fucktard in US history is president (trump, BABY BOOMER), 

All arguments against Gen X are invalidated.

next!

That's just silly - he's one guy.

Walks outs planned for Monday 10 am  PT,  1 pm eastern 

 

just back from a vigil along El Camino in Palo Alto in support of Christine. 

 

Kava NO!

I think Kavanaugh is done for, another accuser and his yearbook “FFFFFFFourth of July”... I doubt he can survive a hearing now.

As usual, Bob Dylan said it best.....

"They all fall there so perfectly
It all seems so well timed"

... I doubt he can survive a hearing now<<<<

Perhaps you're giving the Senate too much credit for being fair and sober?

there you go, interject for the culture of misogyny and abuse.

 

this guy also thinks birth control is an abortifacient...

thom what’s your daughter say/feel about all this? 

fuckin trash. 

This Avenatti character sure seems sketchy.

Kavanaugh and his supporters are pure evil. The hubris of these racist rapist is staggering. Did you really think no one was going to find out about your frat days in "tit & clit"? These maroons truly believe they are above the laws of human decency. 

Thom, so Bob Dylan considered the bricks to be victims of sexual assault and the neon madmen were the abusers???

 

Very interesting...

It's rape now?

Fraternities and the whole Greek bullshit has no place in modern American academia...

^But.....what about Make America Great Again?!

More Americans Galvanized Against Trump than for him - MAGA

Fourth Kavanaugh Accuser Comes Forward, Is Speaking to Authorities in Maryland: Report

The floodgates are opening.

By Matthew Chapman / AlterNet

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/brett-kavanaugh-fourth-accuse...

Women Walk Out Across The Country In Support Of Kavanaugh’s Accusers

#BelieveSurvivors.

By Andy Campbell, Emma Gray, and Laura Bassett

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/women-walk-out-in-support-of-kavana...

No. 4

 

and Kauvanaugh stated today that will will not be withdrawing. Which means we can expect him to drop out any day now... 

>>>It's rape now?

 

I was just wondering the same thing catching up on this thread.

Has Kavanuagh been accused of rape now?

Three?

Mitch McConnell speaking about situation.

Your despicable Mitch!

I know.  Can he just die already?

>>>It's rape now?

 

Maybe that word is being spread because of this:

 

Avenatti’s response to the email was also included in the photo, to which he told Davis that he is “aware of significant evidence of multiple house parties in the Washington, D.C. area during the early 1980s, during which Brett Kavanaugh, Mark Judge and others would participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them.”

 

https://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/408028-avenatti-calls-...

hysteria

Avenatti? Sure, that seems credible. jesus

You guys gotta admit that Trump could've selected a similar candidate who would have been appointed much more easily. 

 

"You reap what you sow."

>Avenatti? Sure, that seems credible.

 

 he’s been able to back up all of his previous claims, what makes you so sure that he’s not credible this time?

Feel free  to point to anything he’s said that makes you question his credibility. Well, not anything from Infowars or Breitbart.

god damn.

what "man" even thinks any of this is ok?

trains?

fucking disgusting.

the FUCK is wrong with people?

hounder is a conservative...? this makes total sense.

>>>>Trump could've selected a similar candidate who would have been appointed much more easily. 

That's why I am starting to think that they still might pull Kavanaugh.  Sure they can plow his nomination through (assuming Collins, Murkowski, or some other GOP senators don't break rank), but the optics will be stomach turning and it will come with a large political price.  

I know they want to get him on the bench before the start of the Supreme Court session next week.  However, the only thing they have to loose by pulling Kavanaugh and replacing him with the next conservative jurist on the list would be 4-4 decisions on whatever cases go before the court before the lame duck Congress votes on the replacement nomination, which they have still have time to do before the new congress takes their seats in January . 

Do Trump supporters even care about this?  Even the female supporters?  It all makes me want to stick my head in the sand.

edited for civility:

Thom maybe think for yourself and your female relatives. Oh, your country too.

 

Actual concrete proof?

Actual concrete proof of what, hillman?

>Actual concrete proof?<

what would that be? video or photographic evidence?

DNA?

 

why would a successful DR. who did not want to come out publicly do so? while risking her career and frankly her whole family's saftey? what does she have to gain?

anything besides innuendo, accusations & hysteria? is the dr the second woman with accusations? nyt couldn't get corroboration on the claims

 

The Times interviewed dozens to corroborate 2nd allegation against Kavanaugh and could find no one with firsthand knowledge. Ramirez told ex-classmates she couldn’t be certain Kavanaugh was the one who exposed himself. ⁦@SherylNYT⁩ ⁦@npfandos⁩ https://t.co/lGVc4hJzEU

 

so the one making the accusation isn't even able to confirm it was kavanaugh. he must have done it.

These are serious charges. Kavanaugh   needs to testify under oath and be truthful with the FBI background  investigation. Its really not that much to ask for a lifetime appointment.

Hell, Ronnie's pick, Ginsburg, stepped down for smoking cannabis.  Im sure most feel alcohol and sexual abuse are as bad as puffing the reefer.

 

The Republicans will still get someone on the bench to screw over the American  public they just need to put up the show first, so it at least look legitimate.

 

>>> anything besides innuendo, accusations & hysteria?

 

 

this is why women are reluctant to report abuse.

So out of 325.7 million USA residents, the GOP is proposing that THIS GUY becomes 1 of 9 lifetime members of our highest court?!


Think about that for a second...

he was sailing right thru (except for the histrionics bull) until feinstein pulled this shit. she didn't even have a clue that her chauffer (that just seems wrong on so many levels) was a friggin' chinese spy for cryin' out loud. sorry, if he did it fry him. but just because unverified, uncorroborated & unsubstantiated stories have been tossed out, i ain't buying it. and sleazy avenatti doesn't help.

 

TAPPER: "We now have 4 individuals who have come forward who were named by Professor Ford...and all 4...have all said they don't remember anything like this ever happened."

 

GRANTHOLM (I think}: "Right. And that actually corroborates Ford's story..."

>>>> if he did it fry him. but just because unverified, uncorroborated & unsubstantiated stories

 

I agree with Hillman.  The FBI should investigate the claims.

"Who is the more foolish?  The fool who gets paid by the porn star?  Or the fool who pays the porn star $130,000?"

 

Obi.jpg

i don't think kavanaugh paid any porn star. and just because trump nominated him doesn't mean you need to project trump hate against kavanaugh.

damn how things have changed:

i don't like or agree with what you have to say but i'll defend to the death your right to say it. not any longer

innocent until proven guilty. not any longer.

and trump didn't change those ideas.

Sorry, hillman.  I was just trying to be funny (and failed, apparently).

 

Kavanaugh still is innocent until proven guilty.

 

If the GOP judicial committee members play their cards right (including having a trustworthy investigation, or at least one which will satisfy all GOP senators) and Kavanaugh comes out clean, they still have the power to ram this nomination through.

>>> i don't like or agree with what you have to say but i'll defend to the death your right to say it. not any longer

 

is this in regards to "there are fine people on both sides"?

 

>>> innocent until proven guilty. not any longer.

 

seems like they don't want to find out if he's innocent or guilty.

Hillman, would you like Kavanaugh to become a supreme court justice?

 

 

nevermind, i don't care

Guy makes me dislike baseball.

It seems only prudent to have the FBI investigate, as Dr. Basey Ford has suggested, before continuing on Kavanaugh's appointment. Having FBI findings would seem to clarify things.

sorry johnny, thought you were being funny but you went all caps & extra large font, it's a highly charged subject, so i wasn't sure.

liquid i don't really care if he becomes a justice or not. if he is successful i don't think roe v wade is going to be overturned, which seems to be where all the angst is centered.

 

fbi say they are not investigating it. at this point i don't even know if i could even believe them

 

 

is this in regards to "there are fine people on both sides"?<<<<

For those who may seek to "compartmentalize" any given current issue / event:   the reality of the situation: it's all part of the same thing IMO.

The troubling part for me are the precedents that might be necessary to be inadvertently set in order to both mitigate and remove a clear and present danger from the Office of the POTUS.

I am very much an idealist, but also have sufficient understanding of pragmatism to know that sometimes compromising the former is required.

 

>>>innocent until proven guilty. not any longer.

I don't understand why this is so hard for people to understand. I guess it is because Fox and Friends have an agenda to confuse people on this issue. Kavanaugh is not on trial. He is not going to jail. He won't loose his current job, and life will go on for him. The only thing that will change is that he won't get one the most coveted jobs in the world with life time powers to make his view point the final law of the land for decades to come. There is no innocent until proven guilty when you apply for that job. The standard is that there shouldn't be a hint of scandal, because for that job you get to choose only the very best people. He doesn't come close to passing that standard.

Oh yeah and this is an equally ridiculous thing to say because the accuser has asked for a full investigation and Kavanaugh and his gang of old men have said there is no need for and investigation.

 

there is no presumption that he didn't do anything wrong. "innocent until proven guilty" to me is just a phrase that best exemplifies his situation and isn't meant to be a legal declaration with potential for incarceration or other punishment. "tried in the court of public opinion" is another. ymmv

" The standard is that there shouldn't be a hint of scandal, because for that job you get to choose only the very best people."

so i guess all the liberal leaning justices didn't have even a hint of scandal & all the conservative justices did. guess rachel maddow has an agenda also.

there is nothing preventing the fbi from re-opening the investigation, even a gang of old men not wanting it to be re-opened 

Do you like baseball, Hill?

 Have you guys read his yearbook page yet? POS 

 

 not terribly impressive and to be honest I'm a liberal are almost A hippie and I've always hated fraternities 

but I guess it's a good path if you want to go to Wall Street or be in government or a big puffy's CEO

 We have to change the law and have 18 year terms for the justices 

 If only to have justice and slightly depoliticize the process 

Republicans and Democrats always both the opposite on many issues and it's kind of scary

Meant to say  always VOTE along party lines

How many of you oppose the right to abort a fetus?

How many do you think that Christians usually act "Christian "?

Hello

 

how many of you think Trump is "Christian "?

His daughter is Jewish.

"Renate Alumni"

 what does his daughters religion have to do with whether Trump is a Christian or not?

What does chistianity or Judaism have to do with this discussion?

"I'm an independent."  - hillman. 

 

“You need a date / and it’s getting late / so don’t hesitate / to call Renate.”

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-renate.html

I've been keeping an eye on the porn lawyer's Twitter feed today, but so far the big revelation hasn't been dropped yet.

He did post a few hours ago about getting the head of a private elementary school suspended for trolling him on Twitter.

Dude is frying some pretty big fish, no doubt.

As a bigot ii don't think many of the far right who calls themselves  a Christian act "Christian "

love one another, be kind.  Accept others Be forgiving be humble 

what say you?

 

what ? does the discussion or concept offend you?

fake Christian's 

I predict that within 24 hours Kananaugh will withdraw from consideration , citing an unjust  ‘witch hunt’ and the obligatory need to spend more time with family. 

Or he’ll just drink himself to death  - leaving Las Vegas style 

 

~yeah, that’s how I’d script it anyway

I saw that Big b, ha ha . 

Who are the real Christians?

Yeah that"s right folks, I'm a conservative. In other news, accusations are now proof. Fry him!

In still other news, conservatives patriotically defend rapists and rape culture. Don't fry him, just cast him aside and find an actual honorable justice. Maybe that Merrick Garland fellow perhaps?

 

<<<<<How many do you think that Christians usually act "Christian "?>>>>>

I was thinking about that on Sunday when a late to church goer was honking at me for taking too long at a stop sign. 

Yeah that"s right folks, I'm a conservative. In other news, accusations are now proof. Fry him!

In still other news, conservatives patriotically defend rapists and rape culture. Don't fry him, just cast him aside and find an actual honorable justice. Maybe that Merrick Garland fellow perhaps?

In still other news, generalizations are still the bane of critical thinking. 

In still more other news - one might address a generalization by asserting a generalization in response - it's sometimes thought of as parody.

it’s incredible people still support this piece of shit. 

says a lot about you. 

Kavanaugh is a weasel. True fact.

He has Cryottes old school LEGO haircut.

>>>so i guess all the liberal leaning justices didn't have even a hint of scandal & all the conservative justices did.

There are plenty of justices that don't have a hint of scandal on both sides. Kavanaugh is just another example of the scorched earth approach to politics adopted by Republicans. Never retreat, never surrender. Also they are kind of between a rock and a hard place since it is hard to dump Kavanaugh for doing the same thing that the pussy grabber President admitted doing on tape. 

>>>guess rachel maddow has an agenda also.

Nope big difference Rachel is biased as are all people. Fox has an agenda which you can easily see with their revolving door employment policy with the Republican party. At least half the people running for President on the Republican side are auditioning for a job with Fox. Then they mix that agenda with WWE entertainment value where everything is boiled down to a simple plot of villains and heroes. 

 

Porn Lawyer and 2020 Presidential hopeful Michael Avenatti has inexplicably locked his Twitter account this morning.

https://twitchy.com/samj-3930/2018/09/25/looks-bad-after-spending-days-b...

Stu is an embarrassment to viva.  He would fit right in at the reject zone.

porn lawyer

>> participate in the targeting of women with alcohol/drugs to allow a ‘train’ of men to subsequently gang rape them.”

Kavanaugh's defense is he was a virgin for years after the period where the allegations took place. And yet people are saying he had group sex at parties?

Seems like the truth is one of 2 polar opposites and there is no gray area.

It's not "people" saying that he was at group sex parties it was the wife of the person who was in the room when he committed the assault. 

Gar.jpg

Oh ender, it's cut & dried. No gray area at all

There sure is a gray area for "Christians" and other sorts of Republicans who will vote for any conservative candidate no matter what his past includes.

The only thing we can be 100% sure of is that the Republican party will always attack the victims of sexual assault and then wonder why it took them so long to come forward. Unless it was a Democrat who committed the sexual assault.

 

His “I didn’t even French hug a girl till college” defense is pretty funny.

Hillman -- what makes him such a great candidate for SCOTUS?  Since we should just disregard everything that has been brought to the table, what is it that makes him so special? 

 

Innocent until proven guilty..not anymore

When was it ever that way...Google central Park 5 and Donald Trump....kavy has always been loose with the truth...that ridiculous Fox news interview proves it...his I never got that drunk nonsense has already been proven bullshit...

>His “I didn’t even French hug a girl till college” defense is pretty funny.

Never, ever go full GOP. 

 

Hillman is currently typing how he’s not for judge Kavanaugh or Trump and he’s an Independant.

>>>>  so i guess all the liberal leaning justices didn't have even a hint of scandal & all the conservative justices did.

 

 

Gorsuch sailed through last year.

Hillman,

It's easy for me to wait for the evidence to form an opinion.  Why is everyone rushing to a decision when all the relevant testimony is forthcoming? 

Tribalism sucks.

>>>>>>>>>Gorsuch sailed through last year

 

Weird how there wasn’t a made up liberal sex scandal with him

known perjurer for criminal bush gang should = automatic disqualification.

shits absurd.

what IS the evidence?

a video? a photo? dna? a FBI investigation?

how do things like this work?

you know its not a criminal trial?

also should be impeached from his current position.

Kavanaugh wrote “Renate Alumni” in his year book along with a bunch of other football players at his school. This is in reference to Renate Schroeder (now Renate Schroeder Dolphin), a student at a neighboring girls’ school. So he was the kind of guy who felt the need to either call out his sexual conquests in his year book or the kind of guy who lied about his sexual conquests in his year book. Either way he is a pig who never grew out of it.

Renate Schroeder Dolphin was one of the 64 women who signed a letter addressed to Sens. Chuck Grassley and Dianne Feinstein, vouching for Kavanaugh’s behavior during his high school years.

Weird she would sign a letter saying the following for a "pig":

We are women who have known Brett Kavanaugh for more than 35 years and knew him while he attended high school between 1979 and 1983. For the entire time we have known Brett Kavanaugh, he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.

https://heavy.com/news/2018/09/renate-schroeder-dolphin/

She withdrew her name from the letter when the yearbook came to light.

 

Weird to me that he’d preemptively get 64 chicks from high school to sign a letter like that, or does everybody but me have that letter just in case?

ender: I agree that tribalism sucks.

I also agree that it's good to wait for evidence to form an opinion. 

 

That's a big part of why I am so disturbed that the Senate leadership has withheld so much evidence from the start of this process and that this same leadership is trying to rush this process so quickly. 

 

Isn't that alarming to you?

 

I'll add that when information is withheld and/or limited, it's natural to form an opinion with what is available in the moment and asking the question: "What are they trying to hide?"

 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2018/09/24/business/brett-kavanaugh-yearbook-ren...

...

The word “Renate” appears at least 14 times in Georgetown Preparatory School’s 1983 yearbook, on individuals’ pages and in a group photo of nine football players, including Judge Kavanaugh, who were described as the “Renate Alumni.” It is a reference to Renate Schroeder, then a student at a nearby Catholic girls’ school.

Two of Judge Kavanaugh’s classmates say the mentions of Renate were part of the football players’ unsubstantiated boasting about their conquests.

“They were very disrespectful, at least verbally, with Renate,” said Sean Hagan, a Georgetown Prep student at the time, referring to Judge Kavanaugh and his teammates. “I can’t express how disgusted I am with them, then and now.”

...

This month, Renate Schroeder Dolphin joined 64 other women who, saying they knew Judge Kavanaugh during their high school years, signed a letter to the leaders of the Senate Judiciary Committee, which is weighing Judge Kavanaugh’s nomination. The letter stated that “he has behaved honorably and treated women with respect.”

When Ms. Dolphin signed the Sept. 14 letter, she wasn’t aware of the “Renate” yearbook references on the pages of Judge Kavanaugh and his football teammates.

“I learned about these yearbook pages only a few days ago,” Ms. Dolphin said in a statement to The New York Times. “I don’t know what ‘Renate Alumnus’ actually means. I can’t begin to comprehend what goes through the minds of 17-year-old boys who write such things, but the insinuation is horrible, hurtful and simply untrue. I pray their daughters are never treated this way. I will have no further comment.”

...

>> he’d preemptively get 64 chicks from high school to sign a letter like that, 

It wasn't preemptively. It was dated Sept 14, 2018 and he was nominated on July 9, 2018.

>> That's a big part of why I am so disturbed that the Senate leadership has withheld so much evidence from the start of this process and that this same leadership is trying to rush this process so quickly. 

Yes, rushing the process is horrible. Waiting for the last second to bring accusations is horrible. Leaking the letter after guaranteeing Ford's anonymity was horrible. Refusing to vote up or down on Merrick Garland was horrible. 

>>>>>It wasn't preemptively. It was dated Sept 14, 2018 

 

Isn't that two days before the allegations were made public?  Or is my definition of preemptive wrong?

also strange to get 64 females that would remember him...being that he was at an all boys school...

>>>> It wasn't preemptively. It was dated Sept 14, 2018 

>> Isn't that two days before the allegations were made public?  Or is my definition of preemptive wrong?

Nope, a day after:

On September 13, Ford's statement came to light when Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-California) acknowledged the existence of a complaint against Kavanaugh by a woman who requested not to be identified.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brett_Kavanaugh#Christine_Blasey_Ford

Okay.  Thanks for doing the research.  It’s still weird.

feinstein needs to bail.

 Amnesty International just says halt..

 

https://www.amnestyusa.org/press-releases/amnesty-international-usa-issu...

 

>September 24, 2018

Dear Senator,

Amnesty International USA calls on you to halt the vote on President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court of the United States. Amnesty International takes no position on the appointment of particular individuals to government positions, unless they are reasonably suspected of crimes under international law and could use their appointment to the position in question to either prevent accountability for these crimes or to continue perpetration. At the same time, the organization calls on governments to thoroughly vet candidates in regard to any human rights concerns arising from their prior conduct. Amnesty International believes that the vetting of Brett Kavanaugh’s record on human rights has been insufficient and calls for the vote on his nomination for Supreme Court of the United States to be further postponed unless and until any information relevant to Kavanaugh’s possible involvement in human rights violations—including in relation to the U.S. government’s use of torture and other forms of ill-treatment, such as during the CIA detention program—is declassified and made public. Amnesty International has long called for declassification of any documents or other materials depicting or describing enforced disappearance, torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or other human rights violations, including acts of abduction and rendition, by US or non-US personnel after the attacks in the USA on September 11, 2001. According to his biography, Brett Kavanaugh “served for more than five years in the White House for President George W. Bush. From July 2003 until May 2006, he was Assistant to the President and Staff Secretary to the President. From 2001 to 2003, he was Associate Counsel and then Senior Associate Counsel to the President.” In a letter dated August 16, 2018, Senators Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), Patrick Leahy (D-Vt.) and Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) asked Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) to make a number of documents related to Brett Kavanaugh’s record public, noting that, “at least two documents that are publicly available on the Bush Library website from Judge Kavanaugh’s time as Staff Secretary suggest that he was involved in issues related to torture and rendition after 9/11.” More information must be made public to determine Kavanaugh’s role in relation to such practices. In addition to concerns about Kavanaugh’s involvement in torture and other ill-treatment by the U.S. government, Amnesty International is deeply concerned about Brett Kavanaugh’s record on a range of other human rights issues, including sexual and reproductive rights, access to abortion, women’s rights, LGBTI Rights, Indigenous Peoples’ rights, environmental rights, gun violence, refugee rights, criminal justice, surveillance and detentions at Guantánamo. As sexual assault also implicates a number of human rights, including the right to be free from gender-based discrimination and violence, we also call for a thorough vetting in regard to any allegations made against Kavanaugh to this effect, including those by Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Deborah Ramirez.

Sincerely, Margaret Huang Executive Director Amnesty International

Why didn't Kavi go anywhere but Fox news?

Nobody would lob softball questions except Fox.

I've been reading some interesting scenarios today about who Trump might have on deck next, assuming the now very likely possibility that Kavanaugh doesn't get confirmed.

Holy shit. If you think Prep School Douche is bad, wait until you meet the rest of the gang. 

Prep school douche is bad.

Trump has proudly outsourced the Supreme Court to the Federalist Society. This would be the equivalent of a Democrat saying all Supreme Court picks will be made by the ACLU with help from the Southern Poverty Law Center and Code Pink.

Here are some of the things they stand for:

  • Many members of the Federalist Society favor overturning Roe v. Wade
  • The Federalist Society opposes regulation of private property and private businesses
  • The Federalist Society has argued that courts should not take race into account when making decisions.
  • The Federalist Society has forcefully argued against regulations on guns.
  • The Federalist Society had a significant influence on the Citizens United Supreme Court ruling which seriously weakened regulations on campaign finance contributions.

vote scheduled for friday

 

Better not be any Dems voting for this POS or there'll be some 'splainin' to do.

GOP hired a "female assistant" to help grill Dr. Ford. Lordy this stuff is getting weird. Old white men in GOP don't want to look bad interrogating her

also strange to get 64 females that would remember him...being that he was at an all boys school...<<

Someone brought up that and his supposed "Alibi Calendar" and wondered if this is the kind of evidence he finds persuasive from the bench.

 

Evening Brian d. Hopefully you'll be voting in the mid terms. 

I thought this shit was written in a yearbook. It was printed.

It appears brian d has some knowledge or experience to share.

WOW! to that Avenatti  info.    So lets say the FBI does some real investigation and were to find these statements to be credible. Would it meet the criteria for bringing a criminal suit?  I don't know Statute of Limitations in the state(s) for attempted rape/rape. I don't want to get ahead of things here but can it be as simple as a bunch of republican pigs ignoring all this and  saying "hes cool" lets vote to appoint? The highest court in the land for life. Scary ignorant pigs.

Anybody still on the Mr Conductor Kavanaugh “Train” after the latest news?  Turns out he was a young white Bill Cosby.

Only the best people

Fine people on both ends of the rape train

FBI can't investigate and the republicans know it. Judge Kavi's guilty and once questioned by the FBI his lying would become a crime at that point.

I think Judicial Crisis Network likes knowing it could blackmail Kavi and thus control the supreme court and it's pivotal vote. More commercials to come today I'm sure!

wireless keyboard, wireless mouse or viva one of you is responsible for my double posts?

I'm going to have a serious problem if it's the "will of the people" that this toxic nominee becomes our next Justice of the Supreme Court.

 

I was devastated that so many people voted for the pussy grabbing President, but at least I can wrap my head around the idea that many people were voting against Ms. Clinton.

She said she attended “well over ten house parties” from 1981 to 1983. Between 1981 and 1982, she said at these parties she began to notice Judge, Kavanaugh and others would attempt to “‘spike’ the ‘punch’ at house parties I attended with drugs and/or grain alcohol so as to cause girls to lose their inhibitions and their ability to say ‘No.’” 

Kavanaugh and Judge, she said, would “‘target’ particular girls … it was usually a girl that was especially vulnerable because she was alone at the party or shy.” She said she has a “firm recollection” of seeing boys ― including Judge and Kavanaugh ― “lined up outside rooms at many of these parties waiting for their ‘turn’ with a girl inside the room.”

If she saw girls at these parties being drugged and raped, why did she keep going to the parties? 

I'm not victim blaming her, I just can't fathom why someone would knowingly go to such a party?

Yeah man. would you like to see what she was wearing?   I saw people shooting dope, etc. at concerts. I wanted none of it. But I wanted to go with a reasonable expectation of not having someone spike my drink with um, i dunno, Quaaludes.

>>>If she saw girls at these parties being drugged and raped, why did she keep going to the parties? 

Because she was a teenager, it was where the cool kids were hanging out, and getting drugged and raped wasn't the theme of the party. BTW she has a security clearance she is not some flake.

Casey Judge likes driving that train, high on liquid cocaine

Animal House scenario with drunk passed out girl with the devil and angel ring a bell except these frat boys/private school turds listen to the devil. 

Judicial Crisis Network has a crisis on it's hands

Good private school movies...

Making The Grade (1984 with Judd Nelson & Andrew Dice Clay)

Outside Providence (1999 a Farrelly brothers movie, Alec Baldwin kills it)

Dead Poets Society

>> I saw people shooting dope, etc. at concerts. 

Shooting dope is a victimless crime, not really analogous to assault.  Tell me about the time you went to party/concert, saw someone being raped, did nothing about it and went back again?

Sounds crazy to me.

But, but, but, it was where the cool kids went. Any excuse to prop up the story. smh

Allegations sorry Hillman ever hear "Strength in numbers"?

They're not all lying and why is his friend in hiding?

Ender and Hillman l, were the hundreds of gymnasts molested over decades at Michigan State University lying?  Why did they keep going to gymnastics and not say anything?

Timmy,

I don't think that's analogous. Did gymnasts knowingly go to that university with the knowledge that people were being sexually abused there? And then do nothing about it when they saw it? 

People went to the university and were molested, saw people molested and did nothing about it for years.  So yes.  She didn’t know that was going on until she went to the parties.  It’s very analogous.  Turns out 15 year old girls rarely report sexual assault and or misconduct.

Culture, human nature, shame, desire....  Emotional reaction is part of the human condition.  I'd look into it if I were you.  

 

 

lol

 

Ender is a robot.

>> Culture, human nature, shame, desire....  Emotional reaction is part of the human condition.  I'd look into it if I were you.  

If the "human condition" has anything to do with being complacent with others being raped, I'm not interested.

>> Ender is a robot.

"A robot may not injure a human being or, through inaction, allow a human being to come to harm."

It has nothing to do with complacency.  Do you react each and every time you feel that you or someone else is being wronged?  Is there a reason why you didn't react?  Did you feel intimidated?  Were you thinking of the consequences of your reaction?  Did you feel that the person 'deserved it'? 

 

People don't remember that the word "date rape" wasn't even known to most people at that time (I think it was coined about 1986 or 87).  That behavior would not have been labeled "rape".  It would have been seen as boys being boys  and a girl who was either a slut or very stupid because "she knew what she was doing" when she went upstairs with that first guy.  I recall stories of this kind of stuff when I was in high school (not a line of men, but of group of guys doing it with some passed out or super drunk girl).  No one ever called it rape and the women would not have wanted to talk about it after, hoping it would be forgotten by everyone. The group aspect of it would have made them cads, but not criminals. None of that stopped us from going to parties.  I grew out of hanging with those types people fairly quickly, but that culture definitely existed.  Especially at Beach Week.

I remember one dude ordered a bunch of Spanish Fly out of High Times and claimed he was getting laid like crazy by spiking drinks.  He showed us some powder.  We didn't really believe him because he didn't seem suave enough to get laid and no one we knew would have hung out with him anyway.  But I suppose that was the point?  Anyway, no one ever ratted him out or accused him of rape, because that wasn't considered rape.

Ender and Hillman probably didn’t get invited to parties.

They had Calenders full of parties!  

>> No one ever called it rape and the women would not have wanted to talk about it after, hoping it would be forgotten by everyone. 

Weird. I guess being a teenager in the 80s were different than the 90s? Group fucking a drunk girl would always have been considered rape for my peers in my timeline. It's black and white. 

These women’s accusations aside the guy is obviously a huge liar.  He obviously drank heavily and his 40 year old virgin defense is laughable.

 

He should be disqualified for numerous things besides being Legohair McRapey.

Yes, ender, 80's to 90's was different.  Starting in the latter half of the 80's the word "date rape" first starting being used and at college they started telling us that it wasn't cool.  There was a lot of debate about how it wasn't fair to a boy if his date was too drunk to properly object, but that's when the discussion first started at all. Also the discussion of no actually meaning no, although I think that slogan didn't come around until later.  

Ender, in the 1950s they were literally hanging black people.  Societal norms change quickly.

In the letter 80's or very early 90's some young adult men of prominent families in my town picked up a girl at a bar, took her to another bar, spiked her drink with valium, and then took her to a hotel and gang raped her.  She went to the cops.  Half the town was outraged because they said the girl knew what she was getting into when she agreed to go to the second bar.  It was considered very sad that these promising young men could have their lives effected by this dark mark on their record over something so minor that was barely even unacceptable to begin with.  

Lying about receiving and using stolen democratic documents during the bush regime is reason enough for him to be rejected.

seriousley

Which is why you have some Republican lawmakers who are saying that even if it happened it doesn't matter. Just locker room talk and boys being boys

For the record, group fucking a drunk woman in the 70's would have been called rape by my peers as well. The idea that it was more socially accepted in the at any time point is ridiculous. 

>>>>some Republican lawmakers who are saying that even if it happened it doesn't matter

Well, if it did happen, that means the guy is lying through his teeth.  That is something happening right now, not 30 years ago, and by itself is reason to disqualify the guy from being promoted to the SCOTUS. 

 

Ender-   She went to a party as a high school girl,  a young woman. Her reasons were her own.  That's all that should matter.. I don't think she expected to be drugged and raped for going to a party.  She presented a signed affidavit (?).  You and Hillman think this is really just some convenient narrative? come on.

Check out my OP. I said I was skeptical at first due to timing.  But I believe these brave women now and think this situation SCREAMS for serious investigation.

 

 

the basket of deplorability has room for many.

>> You and Hillman think this is really just some convenient narrative? come on.

I'm just discussing the sworn statement. The first two sound more believable than Julie Swetnick.

I'm waiting for testimony to come to a conclusion. Why should I form an opinion when there is more data forthcoming? 

Well, at least we now know that porn lawyer wasn't just talking.

why should I form an opinion when there is more data forthcoming?

 

cause everyone else already has an established opinion i suppose

Short story to share that I've never told anyone because my best friend at the time - we were 15 years old - swore me to secrecy. I think the only person who knew was her older sister.

Now if this guy was running for public office, regardless if he was a Dem or a Republican, you can bet I'd speak out and encourage  my friend to do so. As 15 year olds, we didn't  tell anyone nor did we understand the concept of "date rape" anyway.  Our biggest concern was having the parents find out we had been drinking and she also didn't want to be labeled a "slut". Times have changed..a little. 

That summer a  few of us went to his apartment - he was also a counselor at the summer camp,  older than us though. We all left after having a shot of vodka, pickles and bread. Apparently it's a Russian thing. I honestly cannot remember how I got home. Maybe an older sibling drove us home. Anyway, he told us that he was going to drive my friend home. Yeah, we were dumb and trusting.  Didn't find out till a few months later what actually happened. He gave her more vodka and fucked her.  She was 15 years old, he was twenty something. She told me that she was too drunk to remember much -  she got pregnant. Her older sister took her for an abortion. Lesson learned. 

 

So, if she came forward now and named this guy would anyone believe her? Would this incident disqualify him for a lifetime appointment on the Supreme Court? What if other young women came forward with similar stories? Would it warrant an FBI investigation to see if this guy had a history of "date raping" young women? 

43F955CA-E2F1-4388-90C4-F91B336361C0.jpeg

Hahaha

Nancy, if you told me you went back to that guy's house 10 more times after your friend was raped, I wouldn't believe you either.

The fact that Kav is a judge and is telling these untruths is absolutely incredible. 

 

During the Fox interview, he provided the unsolicited assertion that he was a virgin for many years after high school and that he was drinking legally as a senior in high school. 

 

While the virgin statement seems more significant, yet difficult to verify at this moment, it is very easy to confirm that the legal age to drink all forms of alcohol was increased to 21 years old when K was 17 years old. 

 

It's amazing that during an obviously "lawyered up" interview, K chose to either intentionally lie or to carelessly make an untrue statement. 

Nope. Now, I can’t speak for the other teens that were there that night - or others he may have invited after the night I was there. Secrets, ya know?  

 

 

Good point, Johnny. Either he’s lying or doesn’t know the law. And for someone who wants the lifetime appointment on the court, that should disqualify him, right there.

>

Top of Page Bottom of Page Permalink 

DJ Crazy Pills

 LiquidMonkey on Wednesday, September 26, 2018 – 03:46 pm

Lying about receiving and using stolen democratic documents during the bush regime is reason enough for him to be rejected.

seriousley<

 

uh...like this?

i'm pretty sure i'd be prosecuted if i perjured myself before congress.

isn't that alone grounds for disbarment? let alone be nominated for a scotus...

ender and hilman: I appreciate each of your input. 

 

Heck, I'm glad that the rest of you are participating as well. 

 

It's natural to ask "why" questions when you don't have a readily available answer. 

 

Similarly, it's natural for people to insert their own personal assumptions as proxy answers until the source answers them her/himself. 

 

In addition, I find it very easy to form some sort of opinion no matter how little information is available...

Oh Jesus Christ, I just googled the name of the guy - he’s now a Rabbi at a large congregation. I think it’s, him anyway. it’s been a long time, but his bio seems to match up as does his photo and name. I need to track down my old friend, we haven’t been in touch in years - and fess up to spilling the secret here, and ask if she wants speak out now. 

Democrats have to be the dumbest mutherfuckers alive,

to keep getting had by the biggest scumbags on the planet.

Well, generally speaking the Democrats aren't dumb, they have more integrity and smarts - they just don’t play as dirty as the GOP

Time to get dirty I'd say

 

Ya gotta get angry !

Ya gotta get meeeeeeean !

Patches O'Houlihan

(((patches))) Killed by 1500 lbs of irony

Probably the same 29% that would support Donnie if he shot someone in Times Square. And once Mueller indicts Donnie, they won't care that he colluded with Russia either. 

 

>29% of Americans polled said they supported Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court nomination regardless of whether the allegation is true. (From PBS NewsHour)

I dunno ender, kind of sounds like you have an opinion already.

Looks like Lindsey Graham has an opinion as well:

https://thehill.com/homenews/senate/408553-graham-lashes-out-at-avenatti...

Graham, who sits on the Judiciary Committee, questioned the validity of Swetnick’s claims.

“I have a difficult time believing any person would continue to go to — according to the affidavit — ten parties over a two-year period where women were routinely gang raped and not report it,” he said.

 

Sounds vaguely familiar....

Question for Ender and those "independent" and "undecided" contingent here: 

Do you think  it's a big deal if the accusations are true?

 

And please explain why would it make a difference if women went to the parties 10 times or not?

 

Why do you think these woman came forward? Do you believe it's a Democratic conspiracy? A Con Job?

 

 

 

gram.jpg

 

>>> “I have a difficult time believing any person would continue to go to — according to the affidavit — ten parties over a two-year period where women were routinely gang raped and not report it,” he said.

Sounds vaguely familiar....

 

 

 

is ender lindsey graham?!?

in a radio interview w/ michael moore, he said he spoke with bannon to be part of the film. paraphrasing, he basically said his side always wins because they aim for the head, dems bring pillows to the fight and they know it....

 

 

Reminds me of this from the movie Outbreak but sub the word weapon for judge...

https://getyarn.io/yarn-clip/10dcea03-861b-47b2-9671-be317cc1accc

 

Kavanaugh has lied under oath about other non-sexual stuff that would (in more 'normal' times) likely get his confirmation defeated.  

Documents stolen from Democrats ended up in his hands when he worked for GW Bush. He lied that they didn't.

He was cagey about $200,000 worth of baseball ticket debt that disappeared overnight.

He lied that he didn't know that a very well-known skirt chasing judge that he clerked for was a skirt-chaser.

He lied that he didn't work on Bush-era torture policy.

Kavanaugh is the most partisan judge nominated to the court in decades. 

Read about Robert Bork, his confirmation was defeated with less 'controversy'.

"Pull it."

 

Kavanaugh will be denominated by Happy Hour on Friday (rim shot). He's just hanging out there right now with a bunch of skeletons coming from his closet of drunken escapades.

I wonder if his current gig will be in jeopardy?

>>>>>>Nancy, if you told me you went back to that guy's house 10 more times after your friend was raped, I wouldn't believe you either.

 

So you don’t believe any of the people that made accusations about priests in the Catholic Church?

They were raped and kept going to church.

What does it mean to be "the biggest contributor to the Ralph Club"?

And another (more recent) accusation

 

6056F472-EA19-494B-9B27-94DAC4A4705D.jpeg

I had to look up "Ralph Club"

sorry Johnny...I should have provided the context

Dn6C0U7UUAAHjrh.jpg

you still don't get it. I'm not defending the man I'm condemning the entire way this is being prosecuted. I don't care if this was obama being nominated, if the accusations were being levelled in the same manner I'd be saying the exact same thing. Yes the FBI can reopen the investigation any time they want to reopen it. Vox had a pretty good article breaking all this investigation stuff down. and these newest allegations would be a lot more believable if the women used a real lawyer instead of a publicity seeking attention whore of a creepy porn lawyer (and that's my formed opinion of avanetti)

We get it Hillman.  You don’t believe any of the women.  You think it’s a liberal deep rape state and you don’t see anything wrong with the way Republicans are handling this.

‘creepy porn lawyer’ how unoriginal... unless Hillman is Tucker Carlson!

What has Avenatti been wrong about?  Guy has a pretty good track record of being proven correct.

From trains to boats. New accuser says Judge Barfsalot sexually assaulted her on a boat.

Wow the Republicans have hired the church lady to question Ford tomorrow. We are going full 80's 

wow_0.jpg

Porn lawyer is less sleazy then rapist president and sexist republican politicians. 

More like #MeToo lawyer of choice since he gets the job done.

The lawyer Republicans hired is Sarah Sanders stylist.

Hillman says Dems & press are all wrong for there whole process but nothing about GOP rush to fill SCOTUS seat. Didn't they once hold open a seat for over a year and now they need to rush it through in name of winning. 

 

Here's Why We Should Take Michael Avenatti Seriously — Despite His Antics

Avenatti is clearly a showman — but he has earned some credibility.

By Cody Fenwick / AlterNet

September 26, 2018, 10:21 AM GMT

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/heres-why-we-should-take-mich...

Hill

man

 

hill of beans. I doubt you are even seeing yourself in the mirror maybe foggy from  taking a hot shower well maybe should take a cold shower

 

Do hill people wear a sweater vest also?

your pre-judgment is as clear as anyone else's let's wait till the facts arrive and then ignore them the main fact is the POTUS is a complete and utter POS

 

FACT

I'm 2023 we're gonna spend more money on debt than on the military

the national debt has gone up 50% in the last one year I'm glad all the rich assholes can send their kids to the frats

over 5000 incorrect statements or misleading statements since he took office

lets  all go grab some pussy shall we

Trump’s lawyer Michael Cohen has plead guilty to numerous federal crimes.  And you Trump ass kissers..  ‘independent voters’ (lol)  go off  on the  ‘creepy porn lawyer’ , who just happens to be a damn fine lawyer, and a lawyer who isn’t going to jail for mob crimes.

Nancy in fine form once again. 

Hillman, I appreciate you hanging in there. 

 

Regarding the potential FBI investigation, my understanding is that it's up to the POTUS to order it.  Is that incorrect?

 

Alternatively, why would the Senate Judiciary Committee not push for the FBI investigation or at least subpoena other witnesses and/or people who were allegedly involved?

That would seem to be consistent with what you posted above, right?

<<<The lawyer Republicans hired is Sarah Sanders stylist

 

Timmy is wise.

Avenatti has been on a full throttle 6.0 twitter melt for about 13 consecutive hours now.

Really good stuff.

https://mobile.twitter.com/MichaelAvenatti

 

Trump brought up George Washington yesterday...  thanks to the Daily Show, his schedule has been pulled from the National Archives;

42549024_10156918565156800_4967173800023031808_n.jpg

thom, is this your wife and kids? they listen so well to you. 

 

 

https://mobile.twitter.com/calebecarma/status/1045029337316159489?ref_sr...

 

 

Stunning new developments.  Fox News is now reporting that the GOP has received statements from two anonymous men admitting that they were the ones who assaulted Dr. Ford.  A clear case of mistaken identity.

How convenient. They gonna take the fall for him on his other lies too?

is there a federal sexual harassment training requirement? 

Republicans are going to pass a bill preventing the CDC from studying sexual assault after this.

yeah, last minute. Will these anonymous men, one of which was described by Graham as "crazy as a loon",  come forward to give their names? The women did.  Its a shitshow.

INVESTIGATE.

Don't think that the church lady has so far been too effective in her examination of the witness.  Typical deposition type questions and the witness is handling it all really well.   Guess its a little better optics than her being harassed by a bunch of slobbering old dudes.

^Do you see this evolving into a final "Ah-ha!" proclamation? 

is there a federal sexual harassment training requirement? 

perhaps the GOP should pass a sexual harassment 'trading' requirement

could come in handy

 Church lady a shill/ pawn

 

why so many stupid irrelevant questions???

Church lady developing trust before she brings some hammer down?

They don't want answers, they just want to push this through.

Dr ford lives in the grateful dead's hometown

she seems to have her shit together 

trump would never engage the FBI ,  he decries the truth   Game show host in chief POSUS

 

>>>a final "Ah-ha!" proclamation? 

Not sure.  The GOP's attorney is attempting to get the witness to acknowledge various inconsistencies in her prior statements.  However, Dr. Ford is handling it all well.  Normally, in a criminal trial, the accused's attorneys would summarize all the various inconsistences in closing argument and hammer home how the prosecution bears the burden of proving the case beyond a reasonable doubt and how all the nit picky things add up to create that reasonable doubt.

However, this is not a criminal case.  It is a job interview.  I think Dr. Ford is handling all this as well as anyone could under the circumstances.   I believe her and hope a couple GOP senators will set aside blind party loyalty, believe her too, and do the right thing and reject this guy's nomination.   

Who here is against abortion?

who supports Kavananaugh for SCOTUS?

 

Is anyone no/yes.  Or yes/no?

The "optics" in this nomination are horrible for the GOP.  Not only will they alienate a great percentage of women voters if they push it through, how would a Kavanaugh confirmation play to the African-American community, having this white perceived sex-assaulter serving on the highest court as convicted sex-assaulter Bill Cosby sits in a prison cell, his career in ruins?

GOP senator: Hatch says 'She's attractive' and 'a nice person'

 

just die already.

Orin Hatch said Dr. Ford was an attractive women to a reporter during the break maybe that's why republicans hire a woman to do the questioning.

sorry turts my 4 legged friend needed a walk mid typing of this message so I didn't see your post.

Glad to have a long break.  Took a walk and made a few phone calls.

 

Now back to paperwork at the desk, earphones employed...

Long live the dead in a slow simmering meltdown. 

Presidential moment Lindsey Graham all pissed people quoted his book about rape survivors courage when it doesn't benefit his team winning. Kavanaugh will be confirmed he said at break.

Lindsey America has lost your number you fucking clown. 

Phil-anthropy

Hi JR!  Hope u are well

 I am feeling a bit emotional these last couple of days. 

 I find the whole political Specter  mind-boggling 

 

In my best melty voice "hypocrisy rules"

 All for one and one for all 

At all costs

>> The "optics" in this nomination are horrible for the GOP. 

He certainly looks bad/guilty enough that they should pull him from consideration.

are our conservative friends beginning to believe dr. ford.....? 

yes...

Trump Is 'Raging' While Watching Christine Blasey Ford Because She 'Seems Credible': Report

Trump is "raging at how bad this has been for Republicans so far" -- and he's telling people that Ford "seems credible" in her testimony.

By Brad Reed / Raw Story

September 27, 2018, 7:48 AM GMT

https://www.alternet.org/trump-raging-while-watching-christine-blasey-fo...

If the Dems hold together we only need 2.

>> are our conservative friends beginning to believe dr. ford.....? 

Are you really Longhair?

the gop prosecutor is trying to undermine her memory. The fact is she testified that she is 100%  confident it was Kavanaugh. and she knew Kavanaugh  not stranger she picked out of the random line up

 

Church lady fail

GOP fail

 

Lindsey Graham

by the aisle 

deflect away

hate the evil democrats

this is not a hearing at all

no one's mind is it open,  circus

Fireworks to commence when Kav takes the seat...

I'm biased but is sure seems like the Republicans have completely fucked themselves today and for what? There are at least a dozen other candidates who hold the same views but aren't douchy scum bags. They really need to stop only watching Fox news. 

She says she is afraid of flying, yet she regularly flies on airplanes.   Doesn't make any sense.  How could anyone believe her?   Case closed.

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/09/27/kavanaugh-accusers-fear-flyin...

I'm afraid of Phil's vocals yet regularly attend PLF shows...

ender still thinks dr ford isn’t credible. lol. 

now go ahead and post some bs response nobody will read. 

So are you Longhair?

yup. 

>>>>>>Who here is against abortion?

 

Who here thinks that abortion is a great thing to celebrate?  No me.  At least, it's not a procedure to be taken lightly.  Nor should it be absolutely prohibited.   (IMO)

BTW: I imagine that Ted Cruz and Lindsey Graham (among other GOP's) must be chomping at the bit to be able to speak to the cameras....

Former Federal Prosecutor Apologizes 'on Behalf of All Men' After Lindsey Graham's Furious Response to Ford's Testimony

This was a complete mess.

By Cody Fenwick / AlterNet

September 27, 2018, 9:42 AM GMT

https://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/former-federal-prosecutor-apo...

Judge Porky's is angry. Now 8 republican white men will help him do some mansplaining.

This guy seems like a hot head. 

Kav is one angry dude. 

Trump Fox pep rally seems to have gotten to him.

tears of a clown in the nomination circus...

There is zero doubt in my mind there will be some repercussions including prosecutions after this shit show diminishes. 

--->Waiting for the last second to bring accusations is horrible

so ender, how do you feel about the two males who came forward TODAY to say they were the rapey creeps who accosted Ford (allegedly).

Did he just refer to Larry Flynt!?

Throw back thursday

42667469_1891577387589130_6933431083924979712_n.jpg

FUCKING LYING PIECE OF SHIT.

HE SHOULD BE PROSECUTED FOR PERJURY AND SENT TO GITMOS.

DEMS NEED TO SUBPOENA HIS BUTT BUDDY AND GET HIS SWORN TESTIMONY.

Kav should make St. Mark very happy shortly in his stupid enjoyments of watching  folks meltdown. 

noodler for the win

chrome you suck just not as bad as IE

Let's hear it for beer. Huzzah.

Somebody get him a beer to cry into.

I just found his daddy! 

42617445_1891410210939181_5653189130708844544_n.jpg

D5E8DCAF-ED2F-4B0B-BD0C-65AAC1BF5137.jpeg

 

I heard last night that he had a very short opening statement....

 

 

So far, I'm not seeing a dent in the armor of established tribalism.  We'll see what the politicians and pundits have to say about it at the end of the day....

Kavi giving long winded answer to dems to run out 5 minute clock to limit questions

well coached judge

At least he's admitting that he was drinking beer underage...wait!  He just talked about drinking age being 18....

Dan, wasn't he a coach for people facing confirmation hearings in the past? 

lying makes people angry

"He said - She said"  is not an effective way to try to determine the truth.

 

Minds will not be changed...

Umm should this guy be on the Supreme Court?

 Absolutely he loves his mother he loves his father he loves his daughter and they all make him cry which shows us how sensitive he is

 

and he' it seemed like half an hour telling us his daddy used  a calendar

to and going to church with automatic

 

each page he gets through in 30 seconds

God I hope there aren't 1000 pages

 

Compose yourself 

animal house 

crocodile tears.  Poor me.    At one point I was mildly sympathetic but Jesus fucking Christ shut the fuck up 

 

JR-   Melty enough?

virgin (Mary). ?

awws..is this a "hard" job interview?

snowflake.

ran out the clock on Leahy questions with BS high school story.

Durban get him

Over 50 minute opening statement.......

 

antihistamine???  Sniff sniff

 crybaby,   man enough?

 

ciao!

 

Guess the Republicans still don't like the FBI...     cant imagine why....

Let he who last not sinned cast the first stone, Mr. Grahame

Whoa Lindsay

Jeeze, thought Senator Lindsey Graham was going to get up and beat someone with a cane like what happened to Charles Sumner on the senate floor back in 1856:

Charles Sumner.jpg

 

republicans "boof" hypocrisy....

the remaining dem senators should defer their time to kamala harris.

why bring a butter knife to a knife fight...

 

what happened to the hired gun? Funny how these repubs are speaking up when questioning kav and then went

mute with ford...

I think that all this high school yearbook talk has caused Kav to regress back into his teenage years...

 

"Big Brett, Little Brett"

this guy is fucking unhinged and not balanced well enough to be ANY judge.

 

is thom watching today?

Lindsey Graham just finished his Attorney General interview for the job after the midterms firing of Jeff Sessions.

In the almost four hours since I last posted the gofundme link, 4700+ people donated an additional $200,000+.

https://www.gofundme.com/help-christine-blasey-ford

 

 

Melty

 

 

not a single answer.  

he needs a drink...

lol

combative, not humble, disrespectful

Looks like somebody in Congress just added Kavenaugh's definition of a "devil's triangle" to wiki.

https://twitter.com/congressedits/status/1045422483082551302

 

Sorry Crapo lying to senate is legal in fact the judge did it already about Bush-Leahy and the GOP senators don't give a shit just ask any of them.

Trump forced this hearing me thinks he knows SCOTUS war is only way to save the GOP ass by rallying the base for midterms.

LINDSAY GRAHAM = CERTIFIED NUT WHACK - O 

N

U

T

 

J

O

B

 

THE HORROR THE HORROR THE HORROR

respect the process GOP crying 

what about Merrick Garland

What a narcissistic prick

This is just compelling and fascinating tv and thread.

How bout a favor if doable.

I'm in my mom's hospital room on a smart phone trying to keep up with this thread while she sleeps.

 

Is a kav accu part 2 thread possible? It takes long time to scroll down .

Jazfish - Have you tried clicking on the blue and green jump up or jump down buttons, to the left of your profile name? It will jump you to the bottom or top of the thread.

finally over nice buddy dog is fed up with my live tweeting zoning this hearing. 

So....what do you boys and girls think?

Will he be confirmed?

Yes , I have. It just magnifies the arrows. Then back. Llol,  lol , I had to scroll again.  Any ways, some damn fine zoning up in here.